2012
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-201211271-00113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Kidney Graft Loss with Posttransplant Presence of Strong HLA Antibodies Detected by Luminex Single Antigen Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only A, B, and DR MM were considered for DSA. Because no clinically validated cut‐off for the Luminex assay is recommended by the provider company, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of ≥500 was used to define the cut‐off for antibody positivity, based on recent data from the CTS serum study that a cut‐off ≥500 MFI gives meaningful results, if de novo antibodies are analyzed .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only A, B, and DR MM were considered for DSA. Because no clinically validated cut‐off for the Luminex assay is recommended by the provider company, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of ≥500 was used to define the cut‐off for antibody positivity, based on recent data from the CTS serum study that a cut‐off ≥500 MFI gives meaningful results, if de novo antibodies are analyzed .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in all these studies, low numbers of patients with graft loss were investigated. We compared in sera of 51 patients with graft loss that were obtained prior to graft failure and in sera of matched controls with functioning grafts the incidence of de novo DSA and non-DSA [ 24 ]. Patients with graft loss showed a higher incidence of both DSA and non-DSA than patients without graft loss.…”
Section: Graft Survival After Development Of De Novo mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on findings from the CTS, we identified five different high‐risk groups: (i) patients with CDC‐PRA of 85% or more (either historical or current); (ii) patients with both HLA class I and class II antibody positivity in ELISA testing (first and retransplant recipients); (iii) retransplant recipients with HLA class I antibody positivity in ELISA; (iv) patients with a positive T‐cell crossmatch prior to antibody removal; or (v) retransplant recipients with a positive B‐cell crossmatch in the presence of HLA class II antibodies (5, 41–43). Categorization of patients at risk for early graft failure was not based on Luminex‐detected DSA as several reports by us and others now indicate that donor‐specific HLA antibodies detected exclusively by the highly sensitive solid‐phase Luminex technology are not associated with graft rejection (44–46). Furthermore, definition of unacceptable HLA antigens by Luminex technology may put the kidney transplant candidate in the case of deceased donor transplantation at a disadvantage due to prolonged waiting time.…”
Section: Special Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%