2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of interleukin4 gene polymorphisms of recipients and donors with acute rejection following living donor liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In organ transplantation, genetic or environmental factors associated with either the donor or the recipient could influence the rejection of the transplanted organ. For instance, polymorphisms of both the transplant donor [ 37 , 38 ] and recipient [ 39 41 ] have been shown to impact graft rejection, and we have previously demonstrated that antibiotic pre-treatment needs to be administered to both the donor and the recipient to result in prolonged skin graft survival [ 20 ]. In the cohousing and fecal transfer experiments described in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In organ transplantation, genetic or environmental factors associated with either the donor or the recipient could influence the rejection of the transplanted organ. For instance, polymorphisms of both the transplant donor [ 37 , 38 ] and recipient [ 39 41 ] have been shown to impact graft rejection, and we have previously demonstrated that antibiotic pre-treatment needs to be administered to both the donor and the recipient to result in prolonged skin graft survival [ 20 ]. In the cohousing and fecal transfer experiments described in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Despite a longstanding interest in immune monitoring strategies, there are currently no available assays other than IS drug levels, liver function tests (LFTs), or biopsies, which are either suboptimal or impractical for assessing individual IS requirements. [12][13][14] Several genomic biomarkers have been proposed to distinguish causes of graft dysfunction, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] but these have not been subjected to robust validation and not analyzed before these events. Having a biomarker that can serially distinguish the onset of rejection versus continued stable graft function, before liver injury occurs, could more specifically enhance current "trial and error" IS practices and outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, F-actin-dependent DNGR-1 signaling facilitates the process whereby antigens associated with dead cell cargo taken up by cDC1 are shuttled into the MHC class I (MHC I) cross-presentation pathway. The latter includes the transporter associated with antigen processing 1 (Tap1) complex, which is essential for antigenic peptide translocation into the ER and, in synergy with other ER chaperones, for loading of the MHC I heavy chain/β-2-microglobulin (β2M) light chain complex [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%