Abstract:IMPORTANCE Nonguideline antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of pediatric infections is common, but the consequences of inappropriate antibiotics are not well described.
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the comparative safety and health care expenditures of inappropriate vs appropriate oral antibiotic prescriptions for common outpatient pediatric infections.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis cohort study included children aged 6 months to 17 years diagnosed with a bacterial infection (suppurative otitis media [OM]… Show more
“…40 A change in guidelines that recommends first-line use of a broad-spectrum antibiotic would likely result in increased resistance, ADEs, and cost. 8,9,49 Fortunately, scientific advancement has rendered it feasible to identify the presence of organisms and resistance-associated genes quickly and reliably. A shift to an evidence-based RDT-guided therapy could reduce ambiguity around which bacterial pathogens are present, if treatment with immediate antibiotics is necessary, and reduce unnecessary costs and ADEs.…”
Background:
Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common indication for antibiotics in children. The associated organism can influence the likelihood of antibiotic benefit and optimal treatment. Nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction can effectively exclude the presence of organisms in middle-ear fluid. We explored the potential cost-effectiveness and reduction in antibiotics with nasopharyngeal rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) to direct AOM management.
Methods:
We developed 2 algorithms for AOM management based on nasopharyngeal bacterial otopathogens. The algorithms provide recommendations on prescribing strategy (ie, immediate, delayed, or observation) and antimicrobial agent. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life day (QALD) gained. We used a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the RDT algorithms compared to usual care from a societal perspective and the potential reduction in annual antibiotics used.
Results:
An RDT algorithm that used immediate prescribing, delayed prescribing, and observation based on pathogen (RDT-DP) had an ICER of $1,336.15 per QALD compared with usual care. At an RDT cost of $278.56, the ICER for RDT-DP exceeded the willingness to pay threshold; however, if the RDT cost was <$212.10, the ICER was below the threshold. The use of RDT was estimated to reduced annual antibiotic use, including broad-spectrum antimicrobial use, by 55.7% ($4.7 million for RDT vs $10.5 million for usual care).
Conclusion:
The use of a nasopharyngeal RDT for AOM could be cost-effective and substantially reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. These iterative algorithms could be modified to guide management of AOM as pathogen epidemiology and resistance evolve.
“…40 A change in guidelines that recommends first-line use of a broad-spectrum antibiotic would likely result in increased resistance, ADEs, and cost. 8,9,49 Fortunately, scientific advancement has rendered it feasible to identify the presence of organisms and resistance-associated genes quickly and reliably. A shift to an evidence-based RDT-guided therapy could reduce ambiguity around which bacterial pathogens are present, if treatment with immediate antibiotics is necessary, and reduce unnecessary costs and ADEs.…”
Background:
Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common indication for antibiotics in children. The associated organism can influence the likelihood of antibiotic benefit and optimal treatment. Nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction can effectively exclude the presence of organisms in middle-ear fluid. We explored the potential cost-effectiveness and reduction in antibiotics with nasopharyngeal rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) to direct AOM management.
Methods:
We developed 2 algorithms for AOM management based on nasopharyngeal bacterial otopathogens. The algorithms provide recommendations on prescribing strategy (ie, immediate, delayed, or observation) and antimicrobial agent. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life day (QALD) gained. We used a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the RDT algorithms compared to usual care from a societal perspective and the potential reduction in annual antibiotics used.
Results:
An RDT algorithm that used immediate prescribing, delayed prescribing, and observation based on pathogen (RDT-DP) had an ICER of $1,336.15 per QALD compared with usual care. At an RDT cost of $278.56, the ICER for RDT-DP exceeded the willingness to pay threshold; however, if the RDT cost was <$212.10, the ICER was below the threshold. The use of RDT was estimated to reduced annual antibiotic use, including broad-spectrum antimicrobial use, by 55.7% ($4.7 million for RDT vs $10.5 million for usual care).
Conclusion:
The use of a nasopharyngeal RDT for AOM could be cost-effective and substantially reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. These iterative algorithms could be modified to guide management of AOM as pathogen epidemiology and resistance evolve.
“…Irrational prescription of antibiotics is strongly linked with triggering accelerated antibiotic resistance, a phenomenon through which microorganisms induce changes in themselves that render them protection against prior antibiotic susceptibility [ 1 , 8 - 10 ]. Furthermore, there is growing recognition that inappropriate antibiotic prescription in children is linked to increasing rates of severe adverse drug events and higher medical expenditures [ 11 ]. Moreover, prescribing errors contribute to a further increase in patient morbidity and mortality [ 12 - 14 ].…”
BackgroundAntibiotics, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), are pharmaceuticals used to treat bacterial infections. There is growing recognition that inappropriate antibiotic prescription in children is linked to increasing rates of severe adverse drug events and higher medical expenditures. There are a few prescriptions audit studies from smaller cities in Northern India, especially those conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic when the unregulated private sector accounted for 90% of antibiotic sales and 75% of healthcare requirements. The study objectives were to determine the rate of outpatient antibiotic prescription and adherence to WHO drug indicators in prescriptions to pediatric outpatients in private healthcare facilities in India.
MethodologyThis cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months (January to March 2022) in the outpatient setting of a private pediatric hospital in Kanpur, a city having a population of nearly three million population located in the state of Uttar Pradesh in India. Prescriptions of children aged <10 years with a history of onset of complaint <14 days were included in this audit. Prescriptions were numbered; data were collected using a specially designed semistructured, pretested prescription audit checklist; and the recommended WHO indicators were also calculated. Data were entered using CSPro (U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA) and analyzed using STATA 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA).
ResultsThis study observed an antibiotic prescription rate of 65.75%, which was higher than the WHOrecommended value, which might indicate indiscriminate usage of antibiotics in the setting. Out of the 144 antibiotic medications prescribed, none were generic and all the antibiotics were prescribed presumptively. The most commonly prescribed medicines were cefpodoxime, azithromycin, and ofloxacin, which were primarily used to treat cough and stomach infections.
ConclusionsThis antibiotic audit conducted in a private hospital outpatient setting in a city in Northern India during the Omicron wave of the COVID-19 pandemic found nongeneric, predominantly oral, presumptive antibiotic prescriptions in nearly two out of three young pediatric patients. Improvement in prescribing practices through regulation, monitoring, and antibiotic stewardship in low-resource settings is urgently warranted to curb the impending global pandemic of antimicrobial resistance.
“…Elsewhere in JAMA Network Open , Butler and colleagues used data from the 2017 IBM MarketScan database to identify ADEs and costs after inappropriate prescribing for common bacterial (suppurative otitis media, pharyngitis, and sinusitis) and viral upper respiratory tract infections in children. Their primary analysis compared outcomes among children who received guideline-discordant therapy with those who received first-line antibiotic agents (amoxicillin for otitis media; amoxicillin or penicillin for pharyngitis; and amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate for sinusitis).…”
It is well-known that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is common in outpatient settings. In addition to potentiating the development of antimicrobial resistance, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing also leads to unnecessary health care expenditures and avoidable adverse drug events (ADEs). While many clinicians are generally aware of these potential threats, it can be difficult to quantify the burden of costs and ADEs associated with inappropriate prescribing.Elsewhere in JAMA Network Open, Butler and colleagues 1 used data from the 2017 IBM MarketScan database to identify ADEs and costs after inappropriate prescribing for common bacterial (suppurative otitis media, pharyngitis, and sinusitis) and viral upper respiratory tract infections in children. Their primary analysis compared outcomes among children who received guideline-discordant therapy with those who received first-line antibiotic agents (amoxicillin for otitis media; amoxicillin or penicillin for pharyngitis; and amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate for sinusitis).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.