Association of HLA loss of heterozygosity with allele-specific neoantigen expansion in response to immunotherapy.

Abstract

e18030 Background: Human leukocyte antigen loss of heterozygosity (HLA LOH) restricts immune recognition of tumors by limiting the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) presentation of neoantigens to T cells and correlates with reduced response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICB) in non-small cell lung cancer. To explore the mechanism behind the impairment of HLA LOH on ICB, we analyzed the relationship between the antigen presentation pathway, neoantigen presentation and response to ICB in a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cohort. Methods: Following baseline sample collection, a cohort of 14 HNSCC patients recieved a single dose of PD-1 inhibitor. The primary tumor mass was definitively resected approximately one month later. If resection was impractical, a second biopsy was taken. Response to therapy was evaluated using RECIST criteria. Each pre- and post-intervention tumor sample and normal PBMC sample were profiled using Personalis’ ImmunoID NeXT Platform, an HLA-enhanced exome/transcriptome platform. HLA LOH was detected using a digital PCR validated machine learning algorithm (DASH). Neoantigen presentation was computationally predicted using a machine learning algorithm (SHERPATM) trained on mono-allelic immunopeptidomics data. Results: We found that 50% of the HNSCC cohort had HLA LOH, a larger percentage than in a large pan-cancer cohort (23%, n=611) and a distinct HNSCC cohort (40%, n=20). Further, two patients had B2M LOH and one patient had a deleterious mutation in an HLA allele. Despite the high frequency of somatic alteration in the antigen presentation pathway, we did not find an association between HLA LOH and ICB response. However, if HLA LOH was still shaping tumor evolution in response to ICB, we would expect to see immune pressure against subclonal tumor populations with neoantigens presentable by the retained HLA alleles but not the deleted HLA alleles. Indeed, we found that significantly more novel post-treatment neoantigens were predicted to bind to deleted HLA alleles compared to their homologous alleles (p=0.045). Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of HLA LOH across tumor types, a greater understanding is needed regarding the impact of HLA LOH on tumor evolution during ICB treatment. Though HLA LOH does not correlate with response to ICB, the consistent shift in neoantigen composition suggests that it acts as an evolutionary force in resistance to response during immunotherapy.