IntroductionBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. In 2012, more than 1.6 million women were diagnosed with breast cancer worldwide. Despite the improvements in screening and therapeutic approaches, in 2012 more than half a million women died due to breast cancer, which is among the leading cause of cancer deaths in women [ 1 ].Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease comprised of tumors with different histological characteristics and clinical outcomes in terms of prognosis, drug response and metastatic potential. Heterogeneous nature of the breast cancer demands delicate approaches to diagnose and follow the most appropriate strategy for clinical management. Classical histological analysis including assessment of hormone receptor (HR) and receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (ERBB2) status, tumor size, histological grade and lymph node invasion was improved in the last decade with the gene expression profi ling. Microarray analysis of mRNA expression revealed mainly four molecular subtypes of breast tumors: (a) luminal A, low grade estrogen receptor (ER)(+) tumors with good prognosis, (b) luminal B, high grade (ER)(+) tumors with poor prognosis, (c) basal-like, HR (−) and ERBB2(−), and (d) ERBB2(+), increased expression of several genes of ERBB2 amplicon [ 2 -4 ]. Molecular subtypes not only provided additional signifi cant information for better diagnosis, prognostic estimates and drug response predictions but also improved our understanding of breast tumor biology (reviewed in [ 5 ]). Effective therapeutic approaches could only be developed by unrevealing the mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis and metastasis. Despite the advancements due to molecular subtypes, there is still room for improvement for better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.G.