2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10102210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of GRACE Risk Score with Coronary Artery Disease Complexity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract: The GRACE score constitutes a useful tool for risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), while the SYNTAX score determines the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study sought to correlate these scores and assess the accuracy of the GRACE score in predicting the extent of CAD. A total of 539 patients with ACS undergoing coronary angiography were included in this analysis. The patients were classified into those with a SYNTAX score < 33 and a SYNTAX score ≥ 33. Spearman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings also suggest that patients with a higher GRACE score have worse cardiac function, more complex coronary lesions, and a worse prognosis. Several previous studies have discovered that patients with high-risk coronary anatomy had a higher GRACE score, which is consistent with our findings [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings also suggest that patients with a higher GRACE score have worse cardiac function, more complex coronary lesions, and a worse prognosis. Several previous studies have discovered that patients with high-risk coronary anatomy had a higher GRACE score, which is consistent with our findings [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, ACS patients with high GRACE risk score may be likely to have vulnerable coronary plaques given the high rates of ischemic events including death and MI in the previous studies [ 9 , 35 ], and the fact that coronary plaque rupture of LCP is the most frequent cause of spontaneous MI, which is defined as disruption of the accumulation of acellular, lipid-rich material in the intima [ 11 , 12 ]. Previous reports showed that the higher GRACE risk score was associated with the higher coronary anatomical complexity using angiographic scoring systems (e.g., SYNTAX and Gensini scores) [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. For instance, Cakar et al showed that among patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS, the higher GRACE risk score was associated with a higher Gensini score and a higher likelihood of having multivessel disease [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of vulnerable patients and lesions can lead to intensive therapeutic managements including a lipid-lowering therapy, potentially resulting in a relevant prognostic benefit as a secondary prevention in patients with ACS [ 14 ]. However, only a few studies have indirectly addressed the relation between GRACE risk score and coronary atherosclerosis using angiographic scoring systems such as the SYNTAX and Gensini scores [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. For instance, a single-center, cross-sectional study showed that among patients with ACS, the GRACE risk score was positively correlated with the SYNTAX score ( r = 0.32, p < 0.001) [ 15 ], indicating that patients with the higher GRACE risk score are likely to have more complex coronary lesions, although the angiographic assessment does not directly provide information on coronary lipid plaques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score has been increasingly used to assess short- and long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Current American and European guidelines recommend using the GRACE risk score as a predictor of major adverse events in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) patients [8,9]. This risk stratification model, which consists of a variety of clinical, electrocardiographic and laboratory parameters that are documented on admission, is commonly used in clinical practice to estimate the risk of death or MI within 6 months, including inhospital events [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%