2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Frontal QRS-T Angle–Age Risk Score on Admission Electrocardiogram With Mortality in Patients Admitted With an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
30
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…There is limited information about the utility of repolarization subintervals and associated repolarization‐related ECG variables for prediction of adverse cardiac events. However, several investigations have found increased mortality risk in various clinical and general populations for the spatial angle between the mean QRS and T vectors [θ(R m T m )] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited information about the utility of repolarization subintervals and associated repolarization‐related ECG variables for prediction of adverse cardiac events. However, several investigations have found increased mortality risk in various clinical and general populations for the spatial angle between the mean QRS and T vectors [θ(R m T m )] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may include: QRS duration [1–3], QRS-T angle [4, 5], corrected QT interval [6], QTc dispersion [7, 8], and heart rate variability [9]. The QT interval represents the time from the onset of ventricular depolarization to the end of repolarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported θ (QRS|T) mean to be predictive of adverse cardiac events in clinical as well as in community-based populations. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Hypertension is one of the major contributing factors for excess risk of cardiovascular disease as well as CHD mortality. Systolic blood pressure was 12 mm Hg higher in the isolated T-wave inversion group than in the reference group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%