Association of enteral feeding with microaspiration in critically ill adults

Bourgault, Annette M.; Xie, Rui; Talbert, Steven; Sole, Mary Lou

doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151611

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, comparing the safety of EN and PN shows that there are more complications with PN. It has been shown that the risk of postoperative adverse events and mortality is increased with PN, particularly for severely ill patients [72][73][74][75]. Moreover, continuing the nutritional intervention postoperatively is crucial to maintain enhanced postoperative outcomes.…”

Section: Comparing Enteral and Parenteral Nutritionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nutritional care in patients undergoing laparoscopic/minimally invasive surgeries for gastrointestinal tumours.

Xuefen,

Yuanyuan,

Qin

et al. 2023

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The introduction of minimally invasive surgeries for gastrointestinal tumours has been associated with many favourable postoperative outcomes and a reduced impact on nutritional status. The literature review begins by discussing the impact of minimally invasive procedures on the nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal tumours, followed by indications for enteral nutrition (EN) in this population, including preoperative nutritional support and postoperative nutritional support. The review then examines the evidence that favours the use of EN in this population, including studies demonstrating improved outcomes with preoperative EN and reduced postoperative complications with postoperative EN. It also discusses potential strategies for improving outcomes with EN, such as early initiation of feeding and individualized nutrition plans. Overall, current evidence shows that EN improves outcomes, reduces complications, and enhances the quality of life. However, the optimal timing, composition of EN, and long-term outcomes are still unclear, indicating the need for future investigations.

show abstract

Section: Comparing Enteral and Parenteral Nutritionmentioning

confidence: 99%