2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Economic Status and Mortality in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Abstract: The high cost of treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a concern for healthcare systems, while the impact of patients’ socio-economic status on the risk of ARDS-associated mortality remains controversial. This study investigated associations between patients’ income at the time of ARDS diagnosis and ARDS-specific mortality rate after treatment initiation. Data from records provided by the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea were used. Adult patients admitted for ARDS treatmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority ( n = 33) were published after 2010, of which four reported the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (17, 18, 27, 29). Most included all admissions to the relevant critical care units, however, some reported outcomes of a specific disease subgroup (21, 31–35). There was diversity in the approach to measuring socioeconomic status—most notably its basis on individual-level measures such as educational attainment, income or housing (3, 29–31, 33, 35–41), or area-based measures (4, 6, 7, 17–28, 32, 34, 42–50).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The majority ( n = 33) were published after 2010, of which four reported the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (17, 18, 27, 29). Most included all admissions to the relevant critical care units, however, some reported outcomes of a specific disease subgroup (21, 31–35). There was diversity in the approach to measuring socioeconomic status—most notably its basis on individual-level measures such as educational attainment, income or housing (3, 29–31, 33, 35–41), or area-based measures (4, 6, 7, 17–28, 32, 34, 42–50).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most included all admissions to the relevant critical care units, however, some reported outcomes of a specific disease subgroup (21, 31–35). There was diversity in the approach to measuring socioeconomic status—most notably its basis on individual-level measures such as educational attainment, income or housing (3, 29–31, 33, 35–41), or area-based measures (4, 6, 7, 17–28, 32, 34, 42–50). The latter included studies using a single measure such as poverty rate in the patient’s census tract (21, 22), to studies using indices of multiple deprivation: composite scores derived from up to 39 indicators across several domains (42).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that this study was carried out in an urban area, so it was to be expected that most participants were from this area. Even though all institutions admitted patients from all socioeconomic strata, from the highest to the lowest ( 27 , 28 ), it was found that the majority of patients with ARF had a low socioeconomic stratum ( 7 , 28 ), all the patients who died during the study belonged to the low socioeconomic stratum, a finding that coincides with the literature, which shows that social and economic disparities represent a risk factor for developing ARF ( 27 ) and it is also related to higher mortality rates ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was highlighted in a systematic review of health outcomes following critical illness (5). Subsequent studies did not show an association between SES and survival rate (6, 7). International data show variability in the association between SES and mortality in ICU patients (8–17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%