2010
DOI: 10.1159/000275822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of DRD4 and COMT Polymorphisms with Disgust Sensitivity in Healthy Volunteers

Abstract: Background: Disgust is a basic emotion that involves feelings of revulsion and withdrawal behavior from dangerous/infectious situations. Very little is known about the genetic basis of disgust sensitivity. The dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genes have been implicated in neuroticism-related traits and approach-related temperaments which are supposed to be associated with disgust sensitivity. The present study aimed to investigate the possible relationship between disgust sen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Met allele reflecting higher cognitive functions in several domains might affect the cognitive aspect of resilience such as cognitive flexibility, which warrants further attention. In addition, in line with the present findings, substantial evidence has shown that the Met allele of the COMT has been implicated in low anxiety-related traits [14,18,38,39]. Because the low-activity Met allele of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism is associated with high availability of dopamine and norepinephrine [15], our findings indicate that high resilience functioning may be associated with a high catecholamine status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Met allele reflecting higher cognitive functions in several domains might affect the cognitive aspect of resilience such as cognitive flexibility, which warrants further attention. In addition, in line with the present findings, substantial evidence has shown that the Met allele of the COMT has been implicated in low anxiety-related traits [14,18,38,39]. Because the low-activity Met allele of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism is associated with high availability of dopamine and norepinephrine [15], our findings indicate that high resilience functioning may be associated with a high catecholamine status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In terms of specific genes and emotion recognition, one previous study reported a weak association of DRD4 polymorphisms with disgust sensitivity [13] . In our examination of relevant DRD4 polymorphisms, we did not find any main effects of DRD4 loci on the recognition of disgust faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Psychopharmacological studies also showed that levodopa administration led to decreased amygdalar activation during the processing of emotional faces in both healthy subjects and PD patients [12] . Most relevantly, researchers found that disgust sensitivity (measured by a questionnaire) was associated with the DRD4 and COMT polymorphisms in healthy subjects [13] . In sum, evidence from clinical reports and experimental studies suggests that DA may play a role in emotion recognition processes [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much remains unknown about the development of disgust propensity, pathogen pressures may have led to the selection of disgust propensity in individuals that is universal and plastic to local environmental variation (Curtis et al, 2011). There is some evidence suggesting that individual differences in disgust propensity may have modest genetic influences (Kang, Kim, Namkoong, & An, 2010). However, research examining parent-child disgust associations have also reported generally stronger correlations (Davey, Forster, & Mayhew, 1993;Rozin, Fallon, & Mandell, 1984), suggesting that disgust propensity may be acquired via social transmission and modelling of pathogen concerns during childhood (Rozin, Haidt, & McCauley, 2008;Stevenson, Oaten, Case, Repacholi, & Wagland, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%