Association of Cumulative Socioeconomic and Health-Related Disadvantage With Disparities in Smoking Prevalence in the United States, 2008 to 2017

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Understanding emerging patterns of smoking disparities among disadvantaged populations can guide tobacco control policy. OBJECTIVE To estimate disparities in smoking prevalence associated with the number of socioeconomic and health-related disadvantages faced by a population among US adults from 2008 to 2017. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Nationally representative cross-sectional annual household-based probability sample of US noninstitutionalized residents. Polytomous regression estimated associations of disadvantage variables, survey year, and their interaction with the following 3 pairwise contrasts: current vs never smoking (estimate of overall disparities), current vs former smoking (unique contribution of disparities in smoking cessation), and former vs never smoking (unique contribution of disparities in smoking initiation). The setting was in-home face-to-face interviews. Participants were respondents in 2008 to 2017 survey years who were aged 25 years or older (N = 279 559). EXPOSURES Self-reported past-year unemployment, income below the federal poverty line, absence of high school diploma, disability/limitation interfering with daily functions, serious psychological distress on the Kessler 6-item screen, and at least 60 past-year heavy drinking days, each coded yes or no. These indicators were summed in a cumulative disadvantage index (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 or 6). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-reported current, former (ever smoked ≥ 100 cigarettes, had since quit, and not currently smoking), and never (<100 cigarettes) smoking. RESULTS Among 278 048 respondents (mean [SD] age, 51.9 [16.8] years; 55.7% female) with data on smoking history (99.5% of the sample), the mean current smoking prevalence across 2008 to 2017 compared with populations without disadvantages was successively higher among populations with 1 disadvantage (21.4% vs 13.8%; current vs never smoking adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% CI, 2.27–2.43), 2 disadvantages (26.6% vs 13.8%; OR, 3.55; 95% CI,3.39–3.72), 3 disadvantages (35.1% vs 13.8%; OR, 5.35; 95% CI, 5.05–5.66), 4 disadvantages(45.7% vs 13.8%; OR, 8.59; 95% CI, 7.91–9.34), or 5 or 6 disadvantages (58.2% vs 13.8%; OR,14.70; 95% CI, 12.30–17.50). In current vs former and former vs never smoking status contrasts, ORs were lower but also showed successively greater associations with increasing cumulative disadvantage. Current (vs never) smoking odds significantly declined each year among populations with 0 (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94–0.96), 1 (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95–0.97), or 2 (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99) disadvantages but did not change across 2008 to 2017 among those with 3 or more disadvantages. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this study demonstrate that US disparities in smoking prevalence from 2008 to 2017 were successively larger with each additional disadvantage faced, were expressed in higher smoking initiation odds and lower smoking cessation odds, and widened over time.

How can a coordinated regional smoking cessation initiative be developed and implemented? A programme logic model to evaluate the ‘10,000 Lives’ health promotion initiative in Central Queensland, Australia

“…These sociodemographic factors contribute to the higher prevalence of smoking in this region. 31 According to a state-wide survey in the year preceding the launching of ‘10,000 Lives’, an estimated ~28,000 adults who smoke resided in CQ. 7 The daily smoking prevalence was highest (17.4%) in the 30–44 years age group.…”

Trends and Regional Variation in Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Association With Socioeconomic Status in Canada, 2005-2016

“…Current smoking was defined as now smoking cigarettes occasionally or daily and having smoked more than 100 cigarettes in lifetime. 15 …”

“…Current smoking was defined as now smoking cigarettes occasionally or daily and having smoked more than 100 cigarettes in lifetime. 15 Health regions refer to administrative areas divided by Canadian provincial government to administer and deliver health care services to all residents. Because the boundaries change over time, 16 health regions were combined to ensure stable units of analysis over the period 2005 to 2016, reducing the number of areas analyzed from 112 to 105 (eTable 1 in the Supplement).…”

The role of traditional risk factors in explaining the social disparities in cardiovascular death: The national health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III)

“…A study of 279,559 participants aged 25 years or older has recently examined the association between smoking disparities and social disadvantages, where cumulative disadvantage index (0–6) was comprised of self-reported past-year unemployment, income below the federal poverty line, education less than high school, disability/limited physical function, serious psychological distress, and heavy drinking. The results showed successively higher odds of current smoking with each additional social disadvantage [ 24 ].…”