2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of catechol-O-methyltransferase genetic variants with outcome in patients undergoing surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
30
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, COMT SNP rs4633 may modulate postsurgical improvement of the disability index score [43]. In addition, COMT pain sensitivity haplotypes affect pain ratings together with pain catastrophizing ratings, again suggesting a modulatory role for COMT in chronic pain [42].…”
Section: Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, COMT SNP rs4633 may modulate postsurgical improvement of the disability index score [43]. In addition, COMT pain sensitivity haplotypes affect pain ratings together with pain catastrophizing ratings, again suggesting a modulatory role for COMT in chronic pain [42].…”
Section: Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…COMT variants are associated with various forms of pain including neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, fibromyalgia, temporomandibular disorder (TMD), headache, and postsurgical pain. [88][89][90][91][92][93] Importantly, COMT alleles also predict pain severity. 94 Furthermore, individuals homozygous for the COMT Val158Met variant consistently demonstrate psychological dysfunction associated with their chronic pain.…”
Section: Central Sensitization and Chronic Dry Eye Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 If we can identify specifi c genetic factors that may infl uence sensitivity, perception, tolerance, and memory of pain, the realm of targeted therapy for CLPB may be near. Large patient cohorts available for subanalyses will be incredibly valuable for future directions of research and the formulation of a new era of "results-based medicine," going beyond the principles formulated for the current era of "evidence-based medicine.…”
Section: Conclusion: From "Evidence-based Medicine" To "Results-basementioning
confidence: 99%