IntroductionLeft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients (1-3). Even though some results regarding the relationship between hypertrophy and the severity of hypertension are contradictory, a number of studies have reported that the prevalence of hypertrophy increases with the severity of hypertension (4, 5).Essential hypertension is a multifactorial condition affecting a large percentage of the adult Turkish population (33.7%) (6). It induces LVH and dilatation, which can lead to heart failure (7, 8). The reasons for the development of LVH in patients with essential hypertension have not been established, and whether or not LVH results from long-term blood pressure (BP) elevation or non-hemodynamic factors affecting the myocardium is still a matter of debate (4, 9, 10).Disturbances in calcium metabolism due to an increase in urinary calcium excretion have been observed in patients with essential hypertension. Thus, it has been suggested that there might be a relationship between calcium metabolism and myocardial hypertrophy (9). Parathormone (PTH) and vitamin D are the major calcitropic hormones, and the levels of these two hormones have been reported to vary in patients with essential hypertension (11). In several studies, a relationship between hyperparathyroidism with LVH and BP elevation has been demonstrated in hypertensive patients (1,(12)(13)(14). However, whether the increase in PTH level is the result of or the reason for the BP elevation has not been elucidated (15). In addition, it has been reported that PTH increases cytosolic free calcium, and this might cause myocardial hypertrophy through biochemical mechanisms (16). Vitamin D increases the calcium level in myocytes as well, and subsequently cardiac contractility increases and affects the PTH level through receptor binding mechanisms (11).The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between calcium metabolism and hypertension by comparing healthy individuals and patients newly diagnosed with mild and moderate essential hypertension, and to elucidate the role of non-hemodynamic factors in the development of LVH in the hypertensive group. Study Design: Cross sectional case-control study.
Material and Methods
Study populationMaterial and Methods: Twenty-seven patients with essential hypertension and 20 healthy individuals were compared with respect to calciotropic hormones, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and urinary and serum biochemical parameters. The correlations between parathormone, vitamin D, and calcitonin levels and LVMI and blood pressure elevation were determined.Results: The parathormone level was significantly higher (p=0.006) and vitamin D level was significantly lower (p=0.01) in the patient group compared with the control group. However, the two groups were similar in terms of albumin-corrected calcium levels, which were within the normal range (p=0.988). The serum sodium (p=0.014) and urinary calcium (p=0.003) levels and L...