2016
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine With Acute Pancreatitis–Induced Hyperglycemia

Abstract: Insufficient inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis, through reduced bioavailability of ADMA, might be a novel significant contributory factor to the severity of AP and subsequent development of hyperglycemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study that inspired our research, patients with AP were staged according to Atlanta criteria. [17] The ADMA reduction was more pronounced between the two sequential samplings in moderately severe patients. Moreover, they found impaired glucose tolerance to be higher in the moderately severe group after recovery and correlated this with ADMA levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a study that inspired our research, patients with AP were staged according to Atlanta criteria. [17] The ADMA reduction was more pronounced between the two sequential samplings in moderately severe patients. Moreover, they found impaired glucose tolerance to be higher in the moderately severe group after recovery and correlated this with ADMA levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Weitz G (28) 2014 391 Severity Classification Germany Karabulut U (29) 2014 98 Severity Classification Brazil Murilo GB (30) 2016 58 Severity Classification Brazil Sun Y (31) 2015 43 Severity Classification China Zhu Y (32) 2017 3260 Severity Classification China Zeng Y (33) 2014 90 Severity Classification China Li G (34) 2016 35 Diagnosis China Deng LH (16) 2017 70 Severity Classification China Lin S (35) 2017 671 Severity Classification China Qi X (36) 2017 204 Severity Classification China Jia R (37) 2015 85 Severity Classification China Xiao S (38) 2015 153 Diagnosis China Joon HC (39) 2015 153 Severity Classification South Korea Huh JH (40) 2018 191 Severity Classification South Korea Kim BG (41) 2013 50 Severity Classification / Diagnosis South Korea Cho JH (42) 2018 60 Severity Classification South Korea Mikolasevic (43) 2016 198 Severity Classification Croatia Mikolasevic (44) 2016 609 Severity Classification / Diagnosis Croatia Trgo G (45) 2016 40 Severity Classification Croatia Vujasinovic (46) 2014 100 Severity Classification Slovenia María CP (47) 2016 56 Severity Classification Spain Bozhychko (48) 2017 233 Severity Classification Spain Ellery KM (49) 2017 122 Severity Classification / Diagnosis USA Sugimoto M (50) 2015 663 Severity Classification USA Gougol A (51) 2017 500 Severity Classification USA Vipperla K (52) 2017 121 Severity Classification USA Vlada AC (53) 2013 67 Severity Classification USA Buxbaum J (54) 2014 25 Severity Classification USA Buxbaum J (55) 2016 60 Severity Classification USA Dimagno M (56) 2014 223 Diagnosis USA Bishu S (57) 2018 357 Severity Classification USA Bem MD (58) 2016 175 Severity Classification USA Nieminen A …”
Section: Author Publication Year Number Of Participants Adopted Atlanta Revision Criteria Nationalitymentioning
confidence: 99%