2007
DOI: 10.1002/art.22813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of arthritis with a gene complex encoding C‐type lectin–like receptors

Abstract: Objective. To identify susceptibility genes in a rat model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to determine whether the corresponding human genes are associated with RA.Methods. Genes influencing oil-induced arthritis (OIA) were position mapped by comparing the susceptibility of inbred DA rats with that of DA rats carrying alleles derived from the arthritis-resistant PVG strain in chromosomal fragments overlapping the quantitative trait locus Oia2. Sequencing of gene complementary DNA (cDNA) and analysis of gene … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
88
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(72 reference statements)
6
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rat Dcar1 is a strong candidate as it appears functional in R17 rats but nonsense mutated in DA rats. 6 Interestingly, we discovered that Dcar1 mRNA expression was rapidly lost in vitro. The strikingly differential in vitro responses of DA-and R17-derived BMMF are therefore most likely not mediated by Dcar1, but rather by the other rat APLEC gene products, that is, Dcir1-4, Mcl and Mincle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rat Dcar1 is a strong candidate as it appears functional in R17 rats but nonsense mutated in DA rats. 6 Interestingly, we discovered that Dcar1 mRNA expression was rapidly lost in vitro. The strikingly differential in vitro responses of DA-and R17-derived BMMF are therefore most likely not mediated by Dcar1, but rather by the other rat APLEC gene products, that is, Dcir1-4, Mcl and Mincle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 The cluster contains seven genes encoding C-type lectin-like receptors, that is, Mincle, Mcl, Dcar1 and Dcir1-Dcir4, which are expressed on leukocytes, to some extent on T lymphocytes, 7 but mainly on neutrophils and antigen-presenting cells, including macrophages. [5][6][7] The ligands and functions of the receptors remain unknown, but the receptor type has been implicated in diverse functions, such as microbial pattern recognition, cellular adhesion and migration, antigen uptake and presentation, T cell co-stimulation, and signal transduction through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory or activating motifs (ITIMs and ITAMs, respectively). [8][9][10][11] Interestingly, we observed earlier that APLEC regulates clinical phenotypes in RA models induced by nonimmunogenic structures that activate the innate immune system, for example, incomplete Freund's adjuvant oil and yeast b-glucan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The novel associations at PRL and NFIA add to the list of suggestive or confirmed anti‐CCP–negative RA susceptibility loci: PTPN22, TNFAIP3, C5orf30, STAT4, BLK 8, SPP1 16, CLEC16A 17, IRF5 18, DCIR 19, 20, CLYBL 14, SMIM21 14, and ANKRD55 21. However, only a few of those associations have been independently replicated or confirmed at genome‐wide levels of significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously tested markers of anti‐CCP–positive RA for their association with anti‐CCP–negative RA 8 and reported that several anti‐CCP–positive RA susceptibility loci (e.g., AFF3, CCR6, CCL21, IL2RA, and CD28 ) were not shared with anti‐CCP–negative RA, while markers at TNFAIP3, C5orf30, STAT4, ANKRD55, BLK, and PTPN22 were associated with both anti‐CCP–positive and anti‐CCP–negative RA. In addition, CLYBL 14, SMIM21 14, SPP1 16, CLEC16A 17, IRF5 18, and DCIR 19, 20 have been reported to be associated with anti‐CCP–negative RA. Of the markers reported to be associated with anti‐CCP–negative RA, only CLYBL 14, SMIM21 14, and ANKRD55 21 have been independently replicated or confirmed at genome‐wide levels of significance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%