2006
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.052720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Mapping With Single-Feature Polymorphisms

Abstract: We develop methods for exploiting ''single-feature polymorphism'' data, generated by hybridizing genomic DNA to oligonucleotide expression arrays. Our methods enable the use of such data, which can be regarded as very high density, but imperfect, polymorphism data, for genomewide association or linkage disequilibrium mapping. We use a simulation-based power study to conclude that our methods should have good power for organisms like Arabidopsis thaliana, in which linkage disequilibrium is extensive, the reason… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polymorphism detection and genotyping power are stronger when averaged across 50-kb intervals containing Ϸ100 (86-126 inner-quartile range) 25-bp features. The added resolution more than makes up for the lower per-site accuracy (23,25) compared with dideoxy sequencing of a single Ϸ500-bp fragment every 100 kb (6). Features within Ϯ25 kb of the central probe in a gene were used to estimate diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The polymorphism detection and genotyping power are stronger when averaged across 50-kb intervals containing Ϸ100 (86-126 inner-quartile range) 25-bp features. The added resolution more than makes up for the lower per-site accuracy (23,25) compared with dideoxy sequencing of a single Ϸ500-bp fragment every 100 kb (6). Features within Ϯ25 kb of the central probe in a gene were used to estimate diversity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population studies based on SNPs generally benefit from high-quality data but typically sparse genome coverage, whereas SFPs tend to be of lower quality yet exceptionally abundant. A power analysis evaluating decay of linkage disequilibrium across various simulated study design parameters indicated that the abundance of lower-quality SFPs compensates for a lack of SNP density (25). In addition, the probability of detecting potential causative polymorphism is considerably greater (17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies have also been developed, which make use of tag arrays for detection of the products of genotyping reactions. These novel array-or chip-based markers are useful for a variety of purposes including genome-wide association studies, population studies, bulk segregant analysis, quantitative trait loci (QTL) interval mapping, whole genome profiling and background screening and so on (Steinmetz et al, 2002;Winzeler et al, 2003;Wenzl et al, 2004Wenzl et al, , 2007aHazen et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2006). A brief account of the development and use of these highthroughput array-based molecular markers in plants is presented in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T ECHNOLOGICAL advances in DNA sequencing have facilitated direct analyses of nucleotide diversity and large-scale single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in diverse eukaryotes, as well as the development of highly parallel SNP genotyping methods and high-resolution linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based association mapping approaches for identifying functionally important nucleotide polymorphisms ( Jorde 1995( Jorde , 2000Lindblad-Toh et al 2000;Risch 2000;Syvanen 2001Syvanen , 2005Buckler and Thornsberry 2002;Nordborg and Tavare 2002;Flint-Garcia et al 2003;Weigel and Nordborg 2005;Kim et al 2006). Very high DNA marker densities are needed for identifying DNA polymorphisms linked to phenotypic and quantitative trait loci through whole-genome association mapping approaches and can only be achieved using SNPs, the most abundant class of DNA polymorphisms (Collins et al 1998;Aquadro et al 2001;Wiltshire et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%