2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-021-01056-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Mapping for Sugarcane Quality Traits at Three Harvest Times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 30 primers, 25 were amplified, and all these primers were tested for association studies. EST-SSR markers are a tool for association studies ( Ukoskit et al., 2019 ; Coutinho et al., 2022 ). The EST-SSR markers related to sucrose content could be more effective than markers that focus on the varied functions of the gene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 30 primers, 25 were amplified, and all these primers were tested for association studies. EST-SSR markers are a tool for association studies ( Ukoskit et al., 2019 ; Coutinho et al., 2022 ). The EST-SSR markers related to sucrose content could be more effective than markers that focus on the varied functions of the gene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mapping population obtained from a cross between commercial cultivars indulges in the introduction of EST-SSR markers into sugarcane linkage mapping ( Oliveira et al., 2007 ; Palhares et al., 2012 ). There are some published reports of association mapping in sugarcane for traits such as biotic stress, cane yield, and sugar content ( Wei et al., 2006 ; Wei et al., 2010 ; Débibakas et al., 2014 ; Banerjee et al., 2015 ; Gouy et al., 2015 ; Singh et al., 2016 ; Barreto et al., 2019 ; Fickett et al., 2019 ; Ukoskit et al., 2019 ; Coutinho et al., 2022 ). There are only a few studies that have investigated the identification of markers or genes for sugar yield traits using interspecific crosses ( Reffay et al., 2005 ; Ukoskit et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Pop2, the plants were planted in 2 m rows with a spacing of 1.5 m between the plants. Additionally, the Pop1 experiment was replicated three times, corresponding to harvest times in May, July, and September (Coutinho et al 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the Pop1 experiment was replicated three times, corresponding to harvest times in May, July, and September (Coutinho et al 2022).…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%