Association between visceral adiposity index and kidney stones in American adults: A cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2007–2018

Wang, Jiahao; Yang, Zhenzhen; Bai, Yunjin; Yin, Shan; Cui, Jianwei; Yan, Xiao; Wang, Jia

doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.994669

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, evidence regarding the association between CVAI and kidney stones (KS) is limited. Recently, a study conducted by Jiahao Wang et al [ 20 ], involving 13,871 American adults from the NHENSE database, found that for VAI values < 75.130, with each unit increase in VAI, the risk of kidney stones increased by 5‰. Another study by Bingbing Hou et al [ 21 ], using the NHENSE database and including 59,842 American adults, after standardizing VAI using LN transformation, the prevalence of kidney stones increased by 13% with each unit increase in VAI, dose-response and threshold effect analyses revealed a linear correlation between VAI and the presence of kidney stones.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between chinese visceral adiposity index and risk of kidney stones in a health screening population: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study

Cai,

Xu,

Chen

et al. 2024

BMC Nephrol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Obesity is an important risk factor for kidney stones(KS). Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index (CVAI), as a specific indicator for visceral obesity in the Chinese population, can more accurately assess the visceral fat content in Chinese individuals compared to Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI). However, the association between CVAI and risk for KS has not been studied. Methods A total of 97,645 participants from a health screening cohort underwent ultrasound examinations for the diagnosis of kidney stones, along with measurements of their CVAI. Logistic regressions were utilized to determine the relationship between different quartiles of CVAI and the incidence of kidney stones. Simultaneously, subgroup analysis and the computation of dose-response curves were employed to pinpoint susceptible populations. Results Among the participants, 2,888 individuals (3.0%) were diagnosed with kidney stones. The mean CVAI values ± standard deviation for the four groups were: Q1 (18.42 ± 19.64), Q2 (65.24 ± 10.39), Q3 (98.20 ± 9.11), and Q4 (140.40 ± 21.73). In the fully adjusted multivariable model, CVAI was positively correlated with urolithiasis (OR = 1.001; 95% CI = 1.000, 1.002). Compared with the first quartile of CVAI, the population in the fourth quartile of CVAI had a higher prevalence of kidney stones (OR = 1.231; 95% CI = 1.066, 1.415). Through subgroup analysis, a positive correlation between CVAI and the risk of kidney stones was found in non-smokers (OR = 1.001, 95%CI:1.000, 1.002), non-drinkers (OR = 1.001, 95%CI:1.000, 1.002), non-hypertensive subgroups (OR = 1.003, 95%CI:1.002, 1.003), and non-diabetes subgroups (OR = 1.001, 95%CI:1.000, 1.002). Conclusion The findings suggest that CVAI could be a reliable and effective biomarker for assessing the potential risk of kidney stone prevalence, with significant implications for the primary prevention of kidney stones and public health.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between chinese visceral adiposity index and risk of kidney stones in a health screening population: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study

Cai,

Xu,

Chen

et al. 2024

BMC Nephrol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Participants were categorized as having kidney stones if they affirming the following question: Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have kidney stones? ( 26 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and kidney stone prevalence in adults: data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007–2018)

Duan,

Huang,

Zhang

et al. 2024

Front. Nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe high prevalence of kidney stones in adults worldwide has prompted research into potential interventions, one of which involves exploring the consumption of antioxidants that may confer protective effects. However, the relationship between the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI), a crucial measure used to assess an individual’s overall antioxidant capacity from daily dietary intake, and kidney stones remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted cross-sectional analysis to examine the association between CDAI and kidney stone prevalence.MethodsThe analysis was conducted utilizing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2018. Antioxidant intake was derived from two 24-h dietary recalls surveys, while CDAI, a comprehensive measure that includes antioxidants like vitamins A, C, and E, zinc, selenium, and carotenoids, was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression were utilized to examine the association between CDAI and the prevalence of kidney stones.ResultsThe study included a total of 28,516 participants, with 2,748 individuals having a history of kidney stones. The median of CDAI was −0.01 (−2.02, 2.37). Individuals in the fourth quartile of CDAI exhibited a significantly lower prevalence of kidney stones compared to those in the first quartile (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.769 [0.633–0.935]), even after adjusting for potential confounding factors (including age, sex, race, education level, poverty income ratio, smoking status, drinking status, body mass index (BMI), energy intake levels, physical activity level, serum calcium concentration, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hypertension, diabetes and supplement use). The RCS analysis revealed a non-linear relationship between CDAI and kidney stone prevalence, with inflection points identified at 0.06 (p for non-linearity = 0.039). Subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent CDAI-kidney stone prevalence associations across all subsets. Furthermore, a significant inverse correlation was observed between CDAI and inflammatory markers.ConclusionThis study provides evidence supporting a reciprocal correlation between adult dietary antioxidant intake, as measured by CDAI, and kidney stone prevalence. These findings emphasize the potential benefits of consuming dietary antioxidants in lowering the risk of kidney stone formation.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the effectiveness of the body roundness index (BRI) as a dependable indicator of metabolic syndrome has been demonstrated in diverse populations and ethnic groups [ 16 ]. Wang J et al discovered a positive correlation between the prevalence of kidney stone disease (KSD) and the visceral adiposity index (VAI), suggesting that a lower VAI is associated with a reduced risk of future kidney stone formation [ 17 ]. Moreover, Lee MR and colleagues also unveiled that waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and VAI were all linked to a higher prevalence of KSD and an increased likelihood of developing incident KSD.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association of novel anthropometric indices with prevalence of kidney stone disease: a population-based cross-sectional study

Hu,

Li,

et al. 2024

Eur J Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between novel anthropometric indices, specifically the body shape index (ABSI) and body roundness index (BRI), and the prevalence of kidney stone disease (KSD) within the general population of the United States (U.S.). Methods This study employed a cross-sectional analysis of participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2020. Various statistical methods, including multivariable logistic regression analysis, restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and subgroup analysis, were utilized to examine the association between ABSI and BRI and the risk of KSD. Results A total of 39,251 individuals were included in the study. First, the RCS plot presented that a linear positive association was found between ABSI and BRI and KSD risk. Second, the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared to the lowest quartile, the adjusted odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for the prevalence of KSD across the quartiles of ASBI and BRI were 0.94 (0.67, 1.30), 1.55 (1.15, 2.10), and 1.74 (1.28, 2.35), respectively, in the fully adjusted model. Third, the ROC curve demonstrated that the area under the curve of ABSI, and BRI was significantly higher than traditional anthropometry or body composition measures, including BMI and waist circumference. Conclusions The findings of our study indicate that the discriminant ability of ABSI and BRI for KSD is significantly superior to that of BMI and waist circumference. Consequently, ABSI and BRI have the potential to more accurately identify an individual’s risk of developing KSD in a clinical setting.

show abstract

Association between visceral adiposity index and kidney stones in American adults: A cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2007–2018

Cited by 8 publications

References 29 publications

Association between chinese visceral adiposity index and risk of kidney stones in a health screening population: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study

Association between chinese visceral adiposity index and risk of kidney stones in a health screening population: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study

Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and kidney stone prevalence in adults: data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007–2018)

Association of novel anthropometric indices with prevalence of kidney stone disease: a population-based cross-sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About