2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03142-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between viral infections and glioma risk: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis

Sheng Zhong,
Wenzhuo Yang,
Zhiyun Zhang
et al.

Abstract: Background Glioma is one of the leading types of brain tumor, but few etiologic factors of primary glioma have been identified. Previous observational research has shown an association between viral infection and glioma risk. In this study, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the direction and magnitude of the causal relationship between viral infection and glioma. Methods We conducted a two-sample bidirectional MR analysis usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 For binary exposure factor variables, we used the exposure factor's odds to estimate its causal effect on the outcome (Burgess and Labrecque, 2018). Furthermore, we conducted a metaanalysis of all results for the same inflammatory biomarkers from both data sources (Zhong et al, 2023). Reverse MR analyses were performed to minimize bias from reverse causality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 For binary exposure factor variables, we used the exposure factor's odds to estimate its causal effect on the outcome (Burgess and Labrecque, 2018). Furthermore, we conducted a metaanalysis of all results for the same inflammatory biomarkers from both data sources (Zhong et al, 2023). Reverse MR analyses were performed to minimize bias from reverse causality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there were enough SNPs for MR analysis. We selected the IVs that are associated with exposure ( p < 5E-06) ( 15 ). Second, to ensure that each SNP is independent, we clumped the data (r2 = 0.001, clumping window = 10,000 kb).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVs with an F-value ≤ 10 were deemed to have a weak correlation with the exposure and were therefore excluded. The calculation formula for the F-statistic is F=β 2 exposure/SE 2 exposure ( 24 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%