2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between the Publication of the Initiating Dialysis Early and Late Trial and the Timing of Dialysis Initiation in Canada

Abstract: Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) randomized clinical trial, which randomized patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 10 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 to planned initiation of dialysis with an estimated GFR between 10 and 14 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (early start) or an estimated GFR between 5 and 7 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (late start), concluded that early initiation was not associated with improved survival or clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between the IDEAL trial results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, the proportion of incident ESRD patients starting dialysis therapy at an eGFR ≥10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 rose from 12.9% in 1996 to 42.6% in 2010, but decreased to 38.4% in 2017 [ 2 ]. A similar trend was found in Canada, where the percentage of patients starting early dialysis therapy (eGFR ≥10.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) rose from 29% in 2001 to 44% in 2009 [ 9 ], while decreasing to 34% in the 2011–15 period [ 10 ]. In recent years, some observational studies have indicated that early commencement of dialysis offers no survival benefit or may be harmful [ 11–16 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In the USA, the proportion of incident ESRD patients starting dialysis therapy at an eGFR ≥10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 rose from 12.9% in 1996 to 42.6% in 2010, but decreased to 38.4% in 2017 [ 2 ]. A similar trend was found in Canada, where the percentage of patients starting early dialysis therapy (eGFR ≥10.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) rose from 29% in 2001 to 44% in 2009 [ 9 ], while decreasing to 34% in the 2011–15 period [ 10 ]. In recent years, some observational studies have indicated that early commencement of dialysis offers no survival benefit or may be harmful [ 11–16 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The idea that, in dialysis, "more is better" is not true for fragile patients. The failure of early dialysis start, which was previously considered synonymous with "healthy" dialysis start, to improve patients' prognoses, the recognition of the importance of residual kidney function in determining survival, and the association of the latter with better nutritional status are all elements in favor of a progressive, incremental dialysis start aimed at reducing dialysis-related morbidity and mitigating "dialysis shock" [21][22][23][94][95][96][97][98][99].…”
Section: Concept and Context: A Special Case Incremental Hemodialysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study clearly demonstrated that IDEAL findings were implemented promptly and underscored the usefulness of registry data in assessing implementation success and impact. 35…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness and Return On Research Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%