2016
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13121203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians Score and Mortality in Patients with Isolated Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study was to use a propensity score-matched analysis to investigate the association between the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) scores and clinical outcomes of patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: The study population comprised 7855 patients aged ≥40 years who were hospitalized for treatment of isolated moderate and severe TBI (an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥3 points only in the head and not in other regions of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed patient information between January 2009 and December 2015 was retrieved from the Trauma Registry System of the hospital. The adult patient cohort included those who were ≥ 20 years of age and hospitalized for the treatment of moderate and severe TBI, defined as an AIS score ≥ 3 points in the head (moderate TBI, AIS 3–4; severe TBI, AIS 5) [ 13 , 14 ]. Polytrauma patients who had additional AIS scores ≥ 3 points corresponding to any other region of the body were excluded from this study [ 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detailed patient information between January 2009 and December 2015 was retrieved from the Trauma Registry System of the hospital. The adult patient cohort included those who were ≥ 20 years of age and hospitalized for the treatment of moderate and severe TBI, defined as an AIS score ≥ 3 points in the head (moderate TBI, AIS 3–4; severe TBI, AIS 5) [ 13 , 14 ]. Polytrauma patients who had additional AIS scores ≥ 3 points corresponding to any other region of the body were excluded from this study [ 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adult patient cohort included those who were ≥ 20 years of age and hospitalized for the treatment of moderate and severe TBI, defined as an AIS score ≥ 3 points in the head (moderate TBI, AIS 3–4; severe TBI, AIS 5) [ 13 , 14 ]. Polytrauma patients who had additional AIS scores ≥ 3 points corresponding to any other region of the body were excluded from this study [ 14 ]. Enrolled patients were divided into a training set (a 6-year span between 2009 and 2014) for generation of a plausible model under supervised classification, and a test set (a 1-year span in 2015) to test the performance of the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical data suggest a strong correlation between TBI and dysfunctions in autonomic regulation, neuroendocrine function, and psychiatric stability [1,[5][6][7][8]. Moreover, recent studies suggest that increased fracture rate is another long-term consequence of TBI [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The combination of an increased fall risk and low bone mineral density post-TBI has been associated with increased fracture rates [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the neurological consequences, TBI induces systemic immune changes that affect peripheral organs and worsen long-term quality of life [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Along these lines, TBI increases the risk of falls, fractures, osteopenia, and osteoporosis [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The increased risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis directly correlates with an elevated incidence of fractures and associated morbidity and mortality [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, at the cutoff of −1, the difference in OSTA performance was minimal regardless of using the femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD as reference [ 20 ]. Based on the OSTA scores, patients could be stratified as with low (OSTA > −1), medium (−1 ≥ OSTA ≥ −4), and high risk (OSTA < −4) for sustaining osteoporosis [ 21 , 22 ]. It is estimated that the probability of a patient with an OSTA score >−4 not having osteoporosis is 99.3% [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%