2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Steroid-Sparing Therapy and the Risk of Perianal Fistulizing Complications Among Young Patients With Crohn Disease

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Perianal fistulizing complications (PFCs) develop in 15% to 30% of patients with Crohn disease (CD), are difficult to treat, worsen quality of life, increase cost of care, and commonly recur. Evidence-based strategies to prevent PFCs are lacking. OBJECTIVES To investigate the effectiveness of medical therapy for reducing risk of PFCs among young people with CD and to test the hypothesis that steroid-sparing therapy (SST) use would be associated with reduced risk of PFC development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Seton treatment should not be recommended as the sole treatment for perianal Crohn's fistulas. 25 In contrast, the use of immunomodulators alone and anti-TNFα alone reduced the risk of PCD development after 2 years by 52% and 47%, 26 respectively. Our study showed that biological therapy concomitant with perianal intervention could significantly decrease fistula recurrence in perianal CD patients compared with conventional medication with surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Seton treatment should not be recommended as the sole treatment for perianal Crohn's fistulas. 25 In contrast, the use of immunomodulators alone and anti-TNFα alone reduced the risk of PCD development after 2 years by 52% and 47%, 26 respectively. Our study showed that biological therapy concomitant with perianal intervention could significantly decrease fistula recurrence in perianal CD patients compared with conventional medication with surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En Asia se reportó una probabilidad acumulada de uso de esteroides del 25-44% (22,40) . Estas cifras elevadas en el uso de corticoides estarían en relación a su rápido control sobre la enfermedad activa (41) , y el descenso progresivo durante el mantenimiento, como en nuestra serie, responde a que existe un mayor conocimiento de los efectos adversos, lo que exige buscar alternativas más seguras y efectivas (42,43) . Es preciso señalar que, algunos pacientes que mantuvieron el uso de corticoides correspondieron a nuestros primeros casos, considerados corticodependientes y en este periodo, antes del 2010, no estaba disponible la terapia biológica en la institución.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A retrospective claims-based study evaluated the role of early use of immunosuppressive therapies in reducing the risk of developing future perianal disease amongst individuals with a new diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. In this study, individuals with a new diagnosis of Crohn’s disease without perianal disease exposed to at least 90 days of immunosuppressants or anti-TNF therapy had a 59% reduction in risk, compared to those not using these agents, of developing symptomatic perianal disease over 2 years[ 16 ]. While these results require further validation, this study raises the possibility that individuals who are identified as having perianal disease may benefit from earlier medical therapy with immunosuppressive or anti-TNF therapy even if they are minimally symptomatic.…”
Section: When Is the Best Time To Commence Anti-tnf Therapy In Perianal Crohn’s Disease?mentioning
confidence: 99%