Association between self‐perceived activity performance and upper limb functioning in subacute stroke

Tomita, Y.; Hasegawa, S.; Chida, Daiki; Asakura, Takeshi; Usuda, Shigeru

doi:10.1002/pri.1946

Cited by 2 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 48 publications

(49 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1). Nine of the studies were descriptive and 11 were interventions [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”

Section: Initial Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the current review, 14 articles examined issues in movement control. Six studies examined issues of both coordination and control [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”

Section: Intra-limb Movement Organization Coordination Vs Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this review, the quantitative measures involved a correlational approach capturing the degree of spatial coupling between shoulder and elbow and synergy index. The qualitative measures consisted of angle-angle diagrams of the shoulder and elbow and angular velocity profiles of the shoulder and elbow [20,[26][27][28]35]. The issues in movement control were examined https://doi.org/10.46889/JCMR.2023.4107 https://athenaeumpub.com/journal-of-clinical-medical-research/ in spatial and temporal domains, in both joint and effector space.…”

Section: Intra-limb Movement Organization Coordination Vs Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The issues in movement control were examined https://doi.org/10.46889/JCMR.2023.4107 https://athenaeumpub.com/journal-of-clinical-medical-research/ in spatial and temporal domains, in both joint and effector space. In joint space, measures of spatial control included maximum joint angles of the shoulder elbow and wrist forearm, as well as range of motion of the shoulder, elbow wrist and forearm [19,20,24,26,[32][33][34]37]. The nature of temporal control was inferred from angular velocity of the elbow, shoulder, wrist and forearm as well as execution time [34,37].…”

Section: Intra-limb Movement Organization Coordination Vs Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In effector space, spatial measures consisted of an index of curvature trajectory length reaching trajectories spectral arch length, constant final position error, path length ratio normalized total displacement of the hand and variability of endpoint position [19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In the temporal domain, the measures included movement duration of the hand peak velocity of the hand number of velocity peaks mean endpoint velocity time to peak velocity end effector velocity profiles, normalized jerk, percentage of movement time in which peak velocity occurred and reaction time of the hand [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”

Section: Intra-limb Movement Organization Coordination Vs Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Intra-limb Coordination and Control in Individuals with Stroke: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations

Przysucha¹

2023

JCMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A substantial amount of descriptive, rehabilitation and review research examined the behavioral (kinematic) nature of intra-limb organization in reaching and grasping actions in individuals who suffered a stroke. However, the majority of this work failed to explicitly address the level of movement organization affected, the conceptual relevance to existing theories of motor control, and the impact of different constraints on the emerging actions. Thus, the purpose was to examine whether the selected studies examined the issue in coordination and/or control, in the context of the existing conceptual frameworks. The second purpose was to delineate which individual and task constraints have been examined in previous work, and infer the degree to which these factors affected the nature of the emerging movement patterns. Methods: The search of four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL), including published work between January 2019 and March 2022, yielded twenty studies. Results: Despite the fact that stroke substantially alters the emerging movement patterns majority of the studies examined issues in control, not coordination. In term of spatial and temporal control, the actions of individuals with stroke were slower and involved minimal use of the shoulder and elbow joints, as compared to their healthy counterparts. The analysis of emerging movement patterns, via inverse kinematics, showed that stroke resulted in segmented coordination between shoulder and elbow, while no studies examined the relations between distal anatomical structures (e.g., elbow and wrist). In terms of specific theories or models of motor control, most research was data-driven as only three studies made inferences to existing motor control theories (e.g., Equilibrium Point Hypothesis). In regards to the second purpose, time after stroke was the most impactful individual constraint which differentiated the nature of movement organization exhibited by those with and without stroke. The impact of variables such as gender and age, on performance of individuals with stroke, was not examined. From the methodological standpoint, lack of measures of intra-individual variability represents an important limitation in rehabilitation research reviewed. Conclusion: Collectively, the understanding of how individuals with stroke organize their actions remains equivocal. This is due to a variety of different methodological approaches used (e.g., forward vs. inverse kinematics), limited insight into critical aspects of movement organization (e.g., coordination) and the effects of key individual constraints (e.g., age/gender) on the nature of emerging movements. Also, the fact that data driven research still represents the primary impetus in this clinical field undermines the validity of the emerging inferences.

show abstract

“…1). Nine of the studies were descriptive and 11 were interventions [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”

Section: Initial Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%