2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between phase angle and height-to-age index classifications of children under five years of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed this trend in studies comparing patients with SAM to HC, where the observed mean PhA in the SAM group was lower (2.1°-2.8°) compared with HC (3.8°-4.3°) ( 32 , 34 , 36 ). However, these values are different from that reported by Macena et al ( 38 ), who observed no differences in PhA between the population with chronic malnutrition (HAZ <2) or risk of chronic malnutrition (HAZ <-1 and > −2) and those with adequate HAZ. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that in chronic malnutrition, there could be an adaptive response to energy restriction that, when there are periods of energy availability, could favor fat storage to the detriment of its use ( 53 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We observed this trend in studies comparing patients with SAM to HC, where the observed mean PhA in the SAM group was lower (2.1°-2.8°) compared with HC (3.8°-4.3°) ( 32 , 34 , 36 ). However, these values are different from that reported by Macena et al ( 38 ), who observed no differences in PhA between the population with chronic malnutrition (HAZ <2) or risk of chronic malnutrition (HAZ <-1 and > −2) and those with adequate HAZ. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that in chronic malnutrition, there could be an adaptive response to energy restriction that, when there are periods of energy availability, could favor fat storage to the detriment of its use ( 53 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…When stratifying the SAM group, the mean ± SD PhA was 2.8° ± 1.2° for the non-edematous group and 2.3° ± 1.0° for the edematous group. Macena et al ( 38 ) evaluated children at risk or in chronic malnutrition (3 ± 0.78 years old) based on HAZ and stratified as: adequate (HAZ >-1), risk of stunting (HAZ <−1 and >-2), or stunted = (HAZ <2). The overall mean ± SD PhA was 4.4° ± 0.6°, and there was no significant difference between the adequate HAZ group (PhA = 4.2° ± 0.7°) and the at-risk HAZ (PhA = 4.5° ± 0.7°) and stunted HAZ (PhA° = 4.4 ± 0.6°) groups ( p = 0.19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations