Association Between Online Information-Seeking and Adherence to Guidelines for Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening

Abstract

IntroductionFrom 2012 through 2014, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended biennial mammography for women aged 50 to 75 and recommended against the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test for men of any age, emphasizing informed decision making for patients. Because of time constraints and other patient health priorities, health care providers often do not discuss benefits and risks associated with cancer screening. We analyzed the association between seeking information online about breast and prostate cancer and undergoing mammography and PSA screening.MethodsWe assessed guideline concordance in mammogram and PSA screening, according to USPSTF guidelines for those at average risk for disease. We used data on 4,537 survey respondents from the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) for 2012 through 2014 to assess online information-seeking, defined as whether people searched for cancer-related information online in the past 12 months. We used HINTS data to construct multivariable logistic regression models to isolate the effect of exposure to online information on the incidence of cancer screening.ResultsAfter controlling for available covariates, we found no significant association between online information-seeking and guideline-concordant screening for breast or prostate cancer. Significant covariate values suggest that factors related to access to care were significantly associated with conformance to mammography guidelines for women recommended for screening and that physician discussion was significantly associated with nonconformance to guidelines for prostate-specific antigen screening (ie, having a PSA test in spite of the recommendation not to have it). Decomposition of differences between those who sought online information and those who did not indicated that uncontrolled confounders probably had little effect on findings.ConclusionWe found little evidence that online information-seeking significantly affected screening for breast or prostate cancer in accordance with USPSTF guidelines among people at average risk.

Informed Choice and Nudging in Mammography Screening: A Discourse Analysis of Australian and Scandinavian Webpages

“…While our analysis has identified the range of strategies used to nudge towards participation, a limitation of a multimodal critical discourse analysis is that it only demonstrates the meaning potential inherent in a text, and cannot make claims about the writer’s intentions or how individual readers will receive a text (Kim et al, 2018; Machin & Mayr, 2012). Moreover, our analysis is based on web pages as they were at one specific moment in time, and content may have been changed since.…”

Black Lives Matter: A Decomposition of Racial Inequalities in Oral Cancer Screening

“…As such, by applying a multifaceted design this study first confirmed the existence of this difference and built upon it by including SES level in an interaction analysis of marginal structural models, and then examined in-depth factors contributing to this difference by using Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition. As far as we are aware, this is the first study that has applied Oaxaca decomposition to oral cancer screening, though its use has been found in studies of disparities in other cancer screenings such as lung, breast, and prostate [ 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”

The Role of Prostate Combination Biopsy Consisting of Targeted and Additional Systematic Biopsy

“…However, many hospitals still decide whether to conduct prostate biopsies based on the PSA level. There is little evidence that the USPSTF guidelines significantly affect people who seek prostate cancer screening [ 20 ]. Therefore, more precise biopsies and delicate patient selection are required.…”