2023
DOI: 10.2147/nss.s431442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Occupational Stress and Sleep Quality: A Systematic Review

Yongchun Mao,
Gunasunderi Raju,
Muhammad Azrul Zabidi
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 74 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It’s suggested that women’s neurobiological mechanisms and hormones, especially fluctuation of ovarian hormones, may affect sleep because of an interaction between hormone levels and circadian rhythm, however, there is a need for future investigations to clarify the underlying mechanism for this association [ 43 , 60 ]. Higher stress levels may lead to poor sleep quality [ 8 , 61 63 ]; while there is a probable gender differences in stress response [ 64 , 65 ]; so, it can be presumed that the impact of gender on stress response may have a role in the association between gender and sleep quality. Moreover, the interplay among sex differences, gut microbiota, and sleep should be considered in this subject [ 41 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It’s suggested that women’s neurobiological mechanisms and hormones, especially fluctuation of ovarian hormones, may affect sleep because of an interaction between hormone levels and circadian rhythm, however, there is a need for future investigations to clarify the underlying mechanism for this association [ 43 , 60 ]. Higher stress levels may lead to poor sleep quality [ 8 , 61 63 ]; while there is a probable gender differences in stress response [ 64 , 65 ]; so, it can be presumed that the impact of gender on stress response may have a role in the association between gender and sleep quality. Moreover, the interplay among sex differences, gut microbiota, and sleep should be considered in this subject [ 41 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%