2017
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Neurocognitive Decline and Visual Field Variability in Glaucoma

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Visual field variability may impair detection of glaucoma progression over time. Despite the possible overlap between neurocognitive disorders and glaucoma in older individuals, no study has investigated the association between cognitive changes and visual field variability. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between global neurocognitive impairment and visual field variability in patients diagnosed as having glaucoma or glaucoma suspects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this finding may also be explained by poor vision and narrowed VF affecting a patient’s performance on the MoCA, especially on sections that require the use of vision for reading and writing. Additionally, it is also possible that poor cognition can affect the reliability and variability of VF testing results [28]. This further complicates the association between VF loss in glaucoma and cognitive function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this finding may also be explained by poor vision and narrowed VF affecting a patient’s performance on the MoCA, especially on sections that require the use of vision for reading and writing. Additionally, it is also possible that poor cognition can affect the reliability and variability of VF testing results [28]. This further complicates the association between VF loss in glaucoma and cognitive function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 Uncorrected refractive error, patient motivation and instruction, fatigue, technician experience, time of day, season, race, cognitive level, and percentage of false-positive responses have been recognized as additional sources of variability. 36 40 Large fluctuations are an obstacle to the proper modeling of VF data, and several strategies have been employed to reduce the noise. 41 A first measure relies on controlling known causes, such as repetition of examinations scored as poorly reliable and training and motivation of both patient and technical staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the low reliability of static perimetry test in patients with AD, this examination was not performed in this group of patients. 20,21 The group with perimetric POAG comprised patients who have been treated for this reason at the Oftalmika Eye Hospital with a normal MMSE score ( ‡27 points), and with glaucomatous features of optic nerve neuropathy. These features were diffuse or focal thinning of the neuroretinal rim, hemorrhages on the edge of ONH, abnormal cup/disc (C/D) ratio >0.6, asymmetry of the two eyes (C/D ratios exceeding 0.2).…”
Section: Study Design and Patient Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%