2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02437-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Myasthenia Gravis–Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and EQ-5D-5L Utility Values: The Additional Effect of Efgartigimod on Utilities

Abstract: Introduction: For patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), the association between symptom severity, often measured with the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) instrument, and utility values is unknown. Methods: Data was analyzed from the phase 3 ADAPT trial, which included adult patients with gMG randomly assigned to treatment with efgartigimod ? conventional therapy (EFG ? CT) or placebo ? CT (PBO ? CT). MG-ADL total symptom scores and the EQ-5D-5L, a measure of health-related qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MG‐ADL is used in the routine clinical management of gMG, where a two‐point improvement since the last patient visit indicates clinical improvement [18]. Of benefit, the MG‐ADL is an MG‐specific questionnaire that can be self‐administered or recorded by the physician, and evidence shows that the MG‐ADL is a reliable assessment, independent of whether it is used as a self‐administered tool by the patient or recorded by a physician [19]. The MG‐ADL provides a good balance between disease evaluation and administration time (approximately 2–3 min) [18], and its consistent use is recommended by the Sub‐committee.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The MG‐ADL is used in the routine clinical management of gMG, where a two‐point improvement since the last patient visit indicates clinical improvement [18]. Of benefit, the MG‐ADL is an MG‐specific questionnaire that can be self‐administered or recorded by the physician, and evidence shows that the MG‐ADL is a reliable assessment, independent of whether it is used as a self‐administered tool by the patient or recorded by a physician [19]. The MG‐ADL provides a good balance between disease evaluation and administration time (approximately 2–3 min) [18], and its consistent use is recommended by the Sub‐committee.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the MG‐ADL can be accurately recorded by the patient, it has applications in telemedicine [18, 19], which is becoming increasingly important given the recent global COVID‐19 pandemic. Although there has been no formal validation of the MG‐ADL in telemedicine for MG, recent work has come close to validating the MG‐ADL in this setting; in this study, only a suitable digital device (e.g., smartphone, tablet) was needed to capture MG‐ADL scores and complete formal validation [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, a total MG-ADL score of 0–4 was considered mild, 5–9 moderate, and 10 or higher severe. These cut-offs were established based on input from neurologists and inclusion criteria from clinical trials, where a score of 5 and above was used to classify patients as moderate-to-severe, and are currently being utilized in multiple publications and analyses [ 36 , 37 ]. The MG-ADL scale was originally designed for clinical settings to be completed by a neurologist while examining his/her patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%