2014
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between mammographic features and clinicopathological characteristics in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast cancer

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between mammographic features and clinicopathological characteristics in invasive ductal carcinoma. A total of 231 patients were retrospectively reviewed from January, 2011 to December, 2012. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, χ test, Spearman's correlation and logistic regression, as appropriate. Of the 231 patients who underwent mammography, malignant calcifications were significantly more frequent in carcinomas that were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we report the largest and most detailed somatic genetic analysis of these two cohorts to gain insights into the mechanism of cancer predisposition associated with MD. The clinico-pathological features of our cohort are largely consistent with data reported in other studies 18 , 19 showing cancers arising in the highest quintiles were more likely to be associated with younger age at diagnosis, an interval cancer diagnosis and a strong family history of breast cancer 20 22 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study we report the largest and most detailed somatic genetic analysis of these two cohorts to gain insights into the mechanism of cancer predisposition associated with MD. The clinico-pathological features of our cohort are largely consistent with data reported in other studies 18 , 19 showing cancers arising in the highest quintiles were more likely to be associated with younger age at diagnosis, an interval cancer diagnosis and a strong family history of breast cancer 20 22 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In a study by Sun et al in 2014, the ratio of malignant calcifications was significantly high in HER2/neu positive cases. [16] Similar findings were reported by Wang et al in 2008. [15] In a systematic review and meta-analysis by Elias et al in 2014, it was found that the presence of microcalcifications increased the chance of HER2/neu overexpression, which was not dependant on the presence or absence of associated mass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the attempt to find useful clues to guide treatment decisions, many studies have analyzed different radiologic findings as possible markers for biologic or clinical traits of tumors; however, few studies have compared these findings among tumor phenotypes. In a recent series of invasive carcinomas, Sun et al [5] found an association between mammographic findings at the time of diagnosis and the molecular phenotype or other clinical characteristics. They reported that malignant calcifications were more common in HER2+ and Luminal B tumors, whereas architectural distortion was more common in TN tumors; our findings in TN tumors differ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor phenotypes can be identified after immunohistochemical analysis; however, in some cases the mammographic findings could be markers of phenotype and even of the likelihood of regional or distant spread. Recent studies analyzing the mammographic findings in the phenotypes that have the worst prognosis (e.g., triple-negative) appear to show that certain findings are common in these tumors; however, contrary to what would be expected, the findings that are most suspicious for malignancy, such as architectural distortion or spiculated lesions, are uncommon in this group [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Most of these studies considered small series at a single center and analyzed mammographic findings together with those of other imaging techniques used in the clinical context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%