2021
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01568-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the possible explanations the authors propose for the lack of a significant association is the inclusion of those studies that include heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), a strain that is known to be less virulent. Some studies do show a clear association between high vancomycin MICs and infection recurrence [22,23]. In our cohort, a higher clinical failure rate was observed in cases with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 2.0 mg/L, but this finding was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the possible explanations the authors propose for the lack of a significant association is the inclusion of those studies that include heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), a strain that is known to be less virulent. Some studies do show a clear association between high vancomycin MICs and infection recurrence [22,23]. In our cohort, a higher clinical failure rate was observed in cases with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 2.0 mg/L, but this finding was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…There have been contradictory results as to whether the reduced susceptibility of staphylococci to vancomycin is associated with a worse outcome. A meta-analysis performed by Ishaq et al evaluating patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteraemia did not find a significant association between mortality or persistent bacteraemia and a higher vancomycin MIC in the susceptibility range (i.e., MIC ≥ 1.5 mg/L [22]. One of the possible explanations the authors propose for the lack of a significant association is the inclusion of those studies that include heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), a strain that is known to be less virulent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The same outcome was applicable to important microbiological predictors, such as the number of cases with MICs for VAN equal to 2 mg/L, that could not be analyzed separately as distinct subgroup. A recent meta-analysis [ 47 ] confirmed seminal results from Kalil and colleagues [ 48 ] in the context of MRSA BSI; high VAN MICs in the susceptible range of MRSA isolates (≥1.5 mg/L) did not augment the likelihood of overall mortality, though the possible confounding effect of more frequent prescription of combination antimicrobial therapy in this subgroup should not be overlooked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Vancomycin is considered as the “last resort” for the treatment of severe infection caused by Gram-positive bacteria, 26 and it has an effective bactericidal ability against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, the most common pathogen causing blood infections in hospitalized patients. 27 Nano-hydroxyapatite is the main component of bone minerals, which is biocompatible with the physiological environment, 28 and can stimulate macrophages to secrete angiogenesis and osteogenic growth factors. 29 This kind of drug-loaded microsphere composite scaffold can be used to repair infectious bone defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%