“…The Egger's test results suggested that publication bias in our meta-analyses of HLA-DR alleles was not remarkable except for the three subgroup meta-analyses. As shown in Table 2 Hohler et al [16] 1997 English Caucasian PCR-SSP 24 NA 70 Outpatients 7 3 Ahn et al [18] 2000 English Korean PCR-SSP 243 156 males, mean age: 41 yr 83 53 males, mean age: 35 yr 8 4 Chen et al [42] 2002 Chinese Chinese Han PCR-SSP 56 43 males, mean age: 47.6 yr 30 22 males, mean age: 38.7 yr 7 5 Akcam et al [33] 2002 English Iran PCR-SSP 30 20 males, mean age: 35.9 yr 30 7 males, mean age: 31.0 yr 7 6 Jiang et al [21] 2003 English Chinese Han PCR-SSP 30 24 males, mean age: 33.2 yr 52 43 males, mean age: 33.46 yr 7 7 Meng et al [20] 2003 English Chinese Han PCR-SSP 56 22 males, mean age: 38.7 yr 30 43 males, mean age: 47.6 yr 7 8 Wu et al [19] 2004 English Chinese Han SSOPH 324 169 males, mean age: 39.1 yr 98 66 males, mean age: 50.9 yr 8 9 Wu et al [19] 2004 English Taiwanese 14 Yang et al [35] 2007 English Chinese Han PCR-SSP 108 Age and sex matched 108 90 males, 58 LC, 24 HCC 7 15 Song et al [44] 2007 Chinese Chinese Han PCR-SSP 102 63 males, mean age: 33.9 yr 276 168 males, 77 LC, 106 ASC 5 14 Zhu et al [36] 2007 English Chinese Han PCR-SSP 133 63 males, mean age: 37 yr 151 120 males, mean age: 40 yr 7 15 Hwang et al [37] 2007 16 Kummee et al [38] 2007 English Thai PCR-SSP 100 48 males, mean age: 51.0 yr 150 80 males, mean age: 30.9 yr 8 17 Cho et al [39] 2008 English Korean PCR-SSP 80 60 males, mean age: 47.9 yr 384 283 males, mean age: 41.0 yr 8 18 Remezani et al [40] 19 Albayrak et al …”