2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between facial measurements and polymorphisms in human epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor β1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past years, there was an increase in SNP-phenotype[ 5 6 7 ] and genome-wide association studies (GWAS),[ 16 17 ] in which many genes/SNPs were linked to some craniofacial phenotypes, including RUNX2 [ 16 17 18 ] and BMP2 . [ 19 20 21 ] However, the understanding of the functional impact of SNPs on gene expression within craniofacial tissue is still largely unexplored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past years, there was an increase in SNP-phenotype[ 5 6 7 ] and genome-wide association studies (GWAS),[ 16 17 ] in which many genes/SNPs were linked to some craniofacial phenotypes, including RUNX2 [ 16 17 18 ] and BMP2 . [ 19 20 21 ] However, the understanding of the functional impact of SNPs on gene expression within craniofacial tissue is still largely unexplored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 4 ] Variations in craniofacial growth lead to different sagittal and vertical morphological patterns. [ 5 6 7 ] Sagittal patterns are most frequently classified into skeletal malocclusion Class I, II, and III,[ 8 ] whereas vertical patterns are differentiated into mesofacial, dolichofacial, and brachyfacial facial growth patterns. [ 9 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cephalometric measurements were obtained through the lateral cephalograms that were digitally traced by trained and calibrated intra and between examiners (intraclass correlation coefficient test >0.89; CI 95%) using the Dolphin Imaging 11.7 software, version 2D (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, a Patterson Technology). The linear and angular cephalometric measurements analyzed are based on Cavalcante et al (2020)6 study (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFD is considered a multifactorial condition dependent on environmental and genetic background for the phenotypic variation 4. It is known that some genes are associated with craniofacial measurements 5–8. In fact, genetic polymorphisms have been associated with mandibular size,7 and recently, epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor (TGF-1) genes were associated with mandibular base length, mandibular length, anterior facial height and ANS-Me distance (linear distance between the anterior nasal spine to menton) 6…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%