2018
DOI: 10.1080/16070658.2018.1489602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between dietary adherence, anthropometric measurements and blood pressure in an urban black population, South Africa

Abstract: The aim was to determine participants' dietary adherence by calculating a diet adherence score based on the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)-style diet; (2) to determine if there was an association between dietary adherence score, anthropometric measurements (waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, waist-toheight-ratio) and blood pressure (BP) in a South African urban black population. Design: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of data collected for the PURE study was underta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the previous study by Emha et al, in which BMI was not associated with BP in hypertensive patients in Cardiology Polyclinic [18]. The reason for the lack of a significant association of BMI with SBP is thought to be the influence of potential confounders, such as diet and physical inactivity, which were not adjusted for [19,20]. Furthermore, DBP did not show any association with the adiposity indices, which affirm the results of the previous study [21], suggesting that SBP may be a better guide than DBP to evaluate cardiovascular and all mortality [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in agreement with the previous study by Emha et al, in which BMI was not associated with BP in hypertensive patients in Cardiology Polyclinic [18]. The reason for the lack of a significant association of BMI with SBP is thought to be the influence of potential confounders, such as diet and physical inactivity, which were not adjusted for [19,20]. Furthermore, DBP did not show any association with the adiposity indices, which affirm the results of the previous study [21], suggesting that SBP may be a better guide than DBP to evaluate cardiovascular and all mortality [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The last subset (4 studies) used more than one tool to gauge food insecurity 39 , 46 , 53 , 54 . While studies on children ≤ 5 years used the Minimum Meal Frequency criterion 39 , the Weight-for-height criterion 43 , and the Quetelet index 35 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 20 studies demonstrating a significant association, 14 were of high quality and 6 of average quality. The association existed even for marginal food security (a less severe level of household food insecurity) (Table 3 ) 33 , 34 , 37 40 , 42 , 45 49 , 51 53 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 The remaining six studies recruited participants from both rural and urban settings. [40][41][42][43][44][45] Overall, the studies selected for inclusion (n = 22 studies) involved a total of 26 609 participants, 12 453 (46.8%) participants were males, and one study recruited only women of reproductive age living in informal settlements in Accra, Ghana 29 . The distribution of the rest of the studies by countries was as follows: 4 from Ethiopia, 25,27,40,41 ; 1 Nigeria, 24 ; 1 Madagascar, 26 ; 3 Ghana, 29,38,39 ; 1 Zambia, 37 ; 2 Tanzania, 28,35 ; 1 Malawi, 34 ; 1 Cameroon, 33 ; 2 Sudan, 30,31 ; 1 Burkina Faso, 42 ; 1 Kenya, 32 ; 1 Botswana, 45 and 3 studies from South Africa 36,43,44 .…”
Section: A) Study Participants and Geographical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,37,40 Another subset (n = 9 studies) measured food insecurity at an individual level using the Minimum Adequate Diet criterion, 24,25,27,31,33,36,37,42,43 the Minimum Dietary Diversity criterion (n = 5 studies), 28,29,38,39,45 and the last subset (n = 4 studies) used more than one tool to gauge food insecurity. 30,37,44,45 While studies on children ≤ 5 years used the Minimum Meal Frequency criterion, 30 the Weight-for-height criterion, 34 and the Quetelet index 26 to ascertain food insecurity. See Table 1…”
Section: B) Food Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%