2022
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.9479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between COVID-19 Booster Vaccination and Omicron Infection in a Highly Vaccinated Cohort of Players and Staff in the National Basketball Association

Abstract: Author Contributions: Drs Tai and Mack had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Grad and Mack are joint senior authors on this work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the best model, which included the cumulative number of exposures and virus lineage in addition to days since detection, gave an overall classification accuracy of 82.9% with an AUC of 90.0% (Ct<30 = 63.7%; Ct≥30/negative = 89.4%) for the frequent testing group and an overall classification accuracy of 84.8% with an AUC of 91.3% (Ct<30 = 69.6%; Ct≥30/negative = 89.6%) in the delayed detection group. These results indicate that while exposure histories help to explain mean viral RNA kinetics, they provide little assistance in predicting an individual's course of infectiousness over time, due to a high degree of individual-level variation, which may be contributed by stochastic effects or other unmeasured characteristics.Vaccination provides multiple layers of protection against SARS-CoV-2, leading to reduced rates of infection(20) and faster clearance of the virus (19). Consistent with these findings, individuals who received two vaccine doses prior to infection with pre-Delta and pre-Omicron variants (N=17) cleared to negative results or high Ct values faster than unvaccinated individuals (N=216) (Supplementary Figure6).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the best model, which included the cumulative number of exposures and virus lineage in addition to days since detection, gave an overall classification accuracy of 82.9% with an AUC of 90.0% (Ct<30 = 63.7%; Ct≥30/negative = 89.4%) for the frequent testing group and an overall classification accuracy of 84.8% with an AUC of 91.3% (Ct<30 = 69.6%; Ct≥30/negative = 89.6%) in the delayed detection group. These results indicate that while exposure histories help to explain mean viral RNA kinetics, they provide little assistance in predicting an individual's course of infectiousness over time, due to a high degree of individual-level variation, which may be contributed by stochastic effects or other unmeasured characteristics.Vaccination provides multiple layers of protection against SARS-CoV-2, leading to reduced rates of infection(20) and faster clearance of the virus (19). Consistent with these findings, individuals who received two vaccine doses prior to infection with pre-Delta and pre-Omicron variants (N=17) cleared to negative results or high Ct values faster than unvaccinated individuals (N=216) (Supplementary Figure6).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…While boosting reduced rates of infection in our cohort, (Tai et al, 2022) 6). This pattern was robust to refitting the model after excluding player infections, resulting in a subpopulation more representative of the general population in age and health status (Supplementary Figure 7).…”
Section: Minimal Differences Across Variants and Vaccination Historie...mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations