Association between community-based self-reported COVID-19 symptoms and social deprivation explored using symptom tracker apps: a repeated cross-sectional study in Northern Ireland

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to investigate the spatial and temporal relationships between the prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms in the community-level and area-level social deprivation.DesignSpatial mapping, generalised linear models, using time as a factor and spatial-lag models were used to explore the relationship between self-reported COVID-19 symptom prevalence as recorded through two smartphone symptom tracker apps and a range of socioeconomic factors using a repeated cross-sectional study design.SettingIn the community in Northern Ireland, UK. The analysis period included the earliest stages of non-pharmaceutical interventions and societal restrictions or ‘lockdown’ in 2020.ParticipantsUsers of two smartphone symptom tracker apps recording self-reported health information who recorded their location as Northern Ireland, UK.Primary outcome measuresPopulation standardised self-reported COVID-19 symptoms and correlation between population standardised self-reported COVID-19 symptoms and area-level characteristics from measures of multiple deprivation including employment levels and population housing density, derived as the mean number of residents per household for each census super output area.ResultsHigher self-reported prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms was associated with the most deprived areas (p<0.001) and with those areas with the lowest employment levels (p<0.001). Higher rates of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms within the age groups, 18–24 and 25–34 years were found within the most deprived areas during the earliest stages of non-pharmaceutical interventions and societal restrictions (‘lockdown’).ConclusionsThrough spatial regression of self-reporting COVID-19 smartphone data in the community, this research shows how a lens of social deprivation can deepen our understanding of COVID-19 transmission and prevention. Our findings indicate that social inequality, as measured by area-level deprivation, is associated with disparities in potential COVID-19 infection, with higher prevalence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms in urban areas associated with area-level social deprivation, housing density and age.

Evaluating the impacts of tiered restrictions introduced in England, during October and December 2020 on COVID-19 cases: a synthetic control study

“…This is because people of disadvantaged communities may not have the same access to outdoor spaces for socialising, there may be differences in the use of restaurants and pubs and differences on the effectiveness of communications aiming to increase compliance with restrictions 5. Understanding the potential differences in effect of control measures by socioeconomic group is important because the pandemic has disproportionally affected more disadvantaged groups 6 7. Interventions designed to control the pandemic may further exacerbate these inequalities if we do not evaluate their differential effects and take actions to mitigate any intervention-generated inequalities 8…”

Spatiotemporal analysis of the morbidity of global Omicron from November 2021 to February 2022

“…However, the stay at home index (an indicator of population mobility) was negatively associated with morbidity. Another study showed that the most deprived areas, the region with the lowest employment rate, and higher housing density were associated with higher morbidity 23 …”

“…Another study showed that the most deprived areas, the region with the lowest employment rate, and higher housing density were associated with higher morbidity. 23 From November 26, 2021 to December 21, 2021, since the emergence of the Omicron variant, the morbidity rate increased slowly. From December 21, 2021 to January 26, 2022, it swiftly reached the peak in just 1 month, demonstrating that the Omicron variant spread rapidly within a short period of time.…”

Understanding and managing uncertainty and variability for wastewater monitoring beyond the pandemic: Lessons learned from the United Kingdom national COVID-19 surveillance programmes

“…those at workplaces, educational facilities, or communal gatherings such as sports or entertainment events), and the load placed upon each STW by industrial activity. Spatial data analysis approaches can be used to characterise the contribution of STW catchments to administrative geographies, which enable greater integration with public health case data (McKinley et al, 2021).…”