2018
DOI: 10.1177/2047487318817662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between clinical risk scores and mortality in atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and network meta-regression of 669,000 patients

Abstract: Aims Many clinical scores for risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation have been proposed, and some have been useful in predicting all-cause mortality. We aim to analyse the relationship between clinical risk score and all-cause death occurrence in atrial fibrillation patients. Methods We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Scopus from inception to 22 July 2017. We considered the following scores: ATRIA-Stroke, ATRIA-Bleeding, CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, HATCH and ORBIT. Papers repo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous systematic reviews have focused on individual predictors for AF, 58 , 59 on AF as a risk factor for other outcomes, 60 , 61 or on risk models for adverse outcomes in AF patients. 62 , 63 However, to our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on performance of incident AF risk prediction models, and the first with a focus on such risk models validated in and applicable to the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous systematic reviews have focused on individual predictors for AF, 58 , 59 on AF as a risk factor for other outcomes, 60 , 61 or on risk models for adverse outcomes in AF patients. 62 , 63 However, to our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on performance of incident AF risk prediction models, and the first with a focus on such risk models validated in and applicable to the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores are validated and used to evaluate thromboembolic and bleeding risk in AF patients, 25 being associated and able to predict the occurrence of death in AF patients. 26 Nevertheless, validation of these scores is lacking in ICU. Despite the high rate of reported events, our data show that CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED are unable to predict stroke and major bleeding.…”
Section: Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years [doubled], diabetes, stroke/transient ischaemic attack/thromboembolism [doubled], vascular disease [prior myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, or aortic plaque], age 65–74 years, sex category [female]), is used to evaluate the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and is recommended by current guidelines to guide the management of antithrombotic therapy. 1, 2 Most of the individual components of the CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score have been considered as risk factors for stroke, irrespective of the presence of AF, and are also included in older stroke risk assessment models, such as the Framingham risk score; 3 furthermore, they have been considered as cardiovascular risk factors in other risk assessment tools that focus on the prediction of overall cardiovascular risk. 4 Many components of the CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score have also been shown to predict outcome after stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%