2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between brain structure and phenotypic characteristics in pedophilia

Abstract: Studies applying structural neuroimaging to pedophiles are scarce and have shown conflicting results. Although first findings suggested reduced volume of the amygdala, pronounced gray matter decreases in frontal regions were observed in another group of pedophilic offenders. When compared to non-sexual offenders instead of community controls, pedophiles revealed deficiencies in white matter only. The present study sought to test the hypotheses of structurally compromised prefrontal and limbic networks and whet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(84 reference statements)
4
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, OFC dysfunction has been assumed to account for impaired executive functions, particularly response inhibition, in pedophilia [Schiffer and Vonlaufen, ]. This assumption is in line with the correlation of our seed's anatomical features with executive functions in healthy subjects [Takeuchi et al, ] and its structural alteration in pedophilia [Poeppl et al, ]. Moreover, these morphology‐based inhibitory deficits in pedophiles should also impact the sexual domain, given the mOFC's contribution to tonic inhibition of sexual arousal [Stoléru, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, OFC dysfunction has been assumed to account for impaired executive functions, particularly response inhibition, in pedophilia [Schiffer and Vonlaufen, ]. This assumption is in line with the correlation of our seed's anatomical features with executive functions in healthy subjects [Takeuchi et al, ] and its structural alteration in pedophilia [Poeppl et al, ]. Moreover, these morphology‐based inhibitory deficits in pedophiles should also impact the sexual domain, given the mOFC's contribution to tonic inhibition of sexual arousal [Stoléru, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(3) Left insular cortex , whose GM volume was found to be reduced in pedophiles [Schiffer et al, ], to be inversely correlated with pedosexual interest and sexual recidivism [Poeppl et al, ] and to abnormally respond to visual sexual stimulation [Poeppl et al, ; Walter et al, ]. (4 and 5) Left and right temporoparietal junction that featured the less GM in pedophilic perpetrators, the younger their victims [Poeppl et al, ], as well as pedophilia‐related dysfunction in a sexual context [Poeppl et al, ; Walter et al, ]. (6) Medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC) , whose GM volume showed the same relationship to victim age as the TPJ [Poeppl et al, ], and which was differentially activated in pedophiles during visual sexual stimulation [Schiffer et al, ,b].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, up to now, studies addressing the neurobiological correlates in this regard are scarce and most of them showed inconsistent results [Mohnke et al, ; Tenbergen et al, ]. The only replicated finding is limited to an amygdala volume reduction in offending pedophiles [Poeppl et al, ; Schiffer et al, ; Schiltz et al, ], although other authors using more stringent type‐1 error correction did not corroborate this result [Cantor et al, ; Cantor et al, ; Gerwinn et al, ], suggesting insufficient effect sizes of the aberrant amygdala volume. In addition, there are studies reporting evidence for frontocortical neural dysfunction in pedophiles with a history of CSO (P + CSO) as indicated by regionally decreased brain volume [Mendez and Shapira, ; Schiffer et al, ], impaired neuro‐cognitive functions [Kruger and Schiffer, ; Schiffer and Vonlaufen, ], as well as altered activity in prefrontal areas comprising the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) [Habermeyer et al, ], dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [Schiffer et al, ], and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) [Schiffer et al, ] during the processing of sexual stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%