Association between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening among populations with low socioeconomic status (SES) in Singapore

Abstract

Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a barrier for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening and a determinant of poor CVD outcomes. This study examined the associations between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in a CVD risk screening program among populations with low SES residing in public rental flats in Singapore. Methods: Data from Health Mapping Exercises conducted from 2013 to 2015 were obtained, and screening participation rates of 66 blocks were calculated. Negative binomial regression was used to test for associations between distances to four nearest facilities (i.e., subsidized private clinics, healthy eateries, public polyclinics, and parks) and block participation rate in CVD screening. We also investigated potential heterogeneity in the association across regions with an interaction term between distance to each facility and region. Results: The analysis consisted of 2069 participants. The associations were only evident in the North/North-East region for subsidized private clinic and park. Specifically, increasing distance to the nearest subsidized private clinic and park was significantly associated with lower [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–0.98] and higher (IRR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.15–3.25) screening participation rates respectively. Conclusions: Our findings could potentially inform the planning of future door-to-door screenings in urban settings for optimal prioritization of resources. To increase participation rates in low SES populations, accessibility to subsidized private clinics and parks in a high population density region should be considered.

Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Community Settings and Primary Health Care: A Pre-Implementation Contextual Analysis Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

“…The SPICES project specifically intends to improve reaching vulnerable low SES groups for CVD prevention. Reaching people with low SES by health promotion and prevention initiatives on a population level is challenging [ 57 , 58 ]. Our respondents stated that a combined approach of implementing a CVD prevention program in both PHC and community settings is needed to increase accessibility to the EBSP and to affect the prevalence of CVD, which is further supported by the literature [ 19 ].…”

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Class II and III Obesity: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Correlation between Glycemic Parameters and Body Mass Index

“…Therefore, identifying the appropriate approach and more understandable strategies for those with lower educational attainment as a way to improve clinical treatment and increase compliance is a challenge for the multidisciplinary healthcare team. In addition, lower educational levels are associated with low socioeconomic status, directly implying reduced access to agile and continuous healthcare services and decreased access to healthy food, equipment for regular PA, and participation in regular PA programs [35][36][37][38][39].…”

Under-utilisation of noncommunicable disease screening and healthy lifestyle promotion centres: A cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka

“…Perceived accessibility and quality of the services were significant predictors of HLC utilisation which was also reported by another local study [ 45 ]. Global literature showed that improving accessibility via flexible appointment times and conducting screening after office hours and on weekends would probably increase public participation, which is also applicable to the HLCs [ 46 ]. Our findings imply the need to improve the accessibility and quality of the services parallel to the increasing demand for HLCs.…”