Association between a novel nutrition‐inflammation prognostic grading system and overall survival in hospitalized adults with cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundMalnutrition and increased systemic inflammatory responses are highly prevalent in patients with cancer and they have a negative effect on prognosis. We aimed to develop a Nutrition‐Inflammation Prognostic Grading System (NIPGS) for patients with cancer, which incorporates the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study totally included 6891 patients diagnosed with cancer. A 4 × 4 matrix incorporating the four NRS 2002 categories within each of the four CRP categories was constructed. Groups with approximate hazard ratios (HRs) were clustered into one grade. The NIPGS consists of four grades, with the survival rate gradually decreasing from grades 1 to 4. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and comprehensive survival analyses were performed.ResultsDuring a median follow‐up of 18.70 months, 2818 death cases occurred. Kaplan–Meier curve showed the survival rate decreased from grade 1 to grade 4 of NIPGS (P<0.001). The NIPGS was an independent risk factor associated with OS adjusting for confounders, with HRs increasing from 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–1.36; P<0.001) in grade 2, 1.58 (95% CI, 1.39–1.80; P<0.001) in grade 3 to 1.92 (95% CI, 1.73–2.13; P<0.001) in grade 4. A high NIPGS grade was also associated with an increased risk of short‐term mortality, poor quality of life, and longer hospital stay and expenses. Two internal validation cohorts confirmed the results of our study.ConclusionThe NIPGS could be an effective prognostic tool for patients with cancer.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.