Handbook of European Societies 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-88199-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association and Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is not valid for all types of future civic participation: students from the new democracies tend to have higher anticipated informal participation. The later could be explained with the existence of only formal, strictly organized, state-controlled and mandatory civic participation in communist countries and the suppression of any autonomous activities by the state (see Coffé & van der Lippe, 2009;Letki, 2004;Schwartz & Bardi, 1997) which led to less formalized and community-based forms of engagement (Immerfall et al, 2010). Even within a single domain of civic participation the new democracies exhibit differences in regard to different activities (higher or lower).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this is not valid for all types of future civic participation: students from the new democracies tend to have higher anticipated informal participation. The later could be explained with the existence of only formal, strictly organized, state-controlled and mandatory civic participation in communist countries and the suppression of any autonomous activities by the state (see Coffé & van der Lippe, 2009;Letki, 2004;Schwartz & Bardi, 1997) which led to less formalized and community-based forms of engagement (Immerfall et al, 2010). Even within a single domain of civic participation the new democracies exhibit differences in regard to different activities (higher or lower).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, data from the the CivED study indicate that levels of trust in government-related institutions are lower in former East Bloc countries and Portugal than the international average (Torney-Purta, 2002a). Furthermore, in Western European countries highly institutionalized forms of civil society are found, while in Southern and Eastern Europe it is more typical to find the less formalized forms of village community, extended clans or other types of social networks, that is, less formalized organizations in comparison to the ones in the West (Immerfall, Priller, & Delhey, 2010). Other studies (see Coffé & van der Lippe, 2009) have also shown that former East Bloc countries have lower levels of participation.…”
Section: Contextual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Comparative studies throughout Europe show that there are different forms and distributions of social capital (e.g., Pichler and Wallace 2007). Immerfall et al (2010) have clustered European countries on the basis of their findings on societal engagement and highlight an East-West divide which can be traced back to the early stage of democracy in Eastern Europe. Ken Newton and Sonja Zmerli (2011) have analyzed different forms of trust and their associations most precisely to come to sophisticated conclusions regarding the social and political stability of countries.…”
Section: Social Trust and Perceptions Of Societal Developments: A Crimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), merges with a local culture based on a low civic (social and political) engagement. This is the case of southern European countries, compared with other European societies (Immerfall et al 2010). Even more so, if these countries are experiencing a time of economic decline in which opportunities of access to institutional means are reducing.…”
Section: Preliminary Questions: On Southern Europe Crisis and Typolomentioning
confidence: 99%