Associating Student Performance in Pharmacy Practice Didactic and Skills-Based Courses With Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between pharmacy practice didactic course exams and performance-based assessments with students' performance during their Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs). Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from the graduating classes of 2018 to 2020. Students were coded as APPE poor performers (final course grade < 83%) or acceptable performers. Assessments in pharmacy practice didactic and skills-based courses in the P2 and P3 years were included in the analysis, with thresholds correlating to grade cutoffs. The association between poor performance mean exam scores and performance-based assessments with APPE performance was calculated. Results: Of the 403 graduates, analysis sample sizes ranged from 254 to 403. There were 49 students (12%) who met the criteria for poor performance in the APPE year. When comparing pharmacy practice didactic course performance to APPE poor performance, the proportion of mean exam scores that were < 83% for six of the seven pharmacy practice didactic courses was statistically significant; five of the seven mean exam scores were statistically significant at the < 78% threshold. Performance-based assessments that were statistically significantly associated with APPE poor performance often required critical thinking. Conclusion:A gap in identification of students with APPE poor performance who did not fail a didactic course was demonstrated. Specifically, this finding suggests that pre-APPE curriculum should focus on assessments that include critical thinking. These methods could be used by other pharmacy programs to find components of their curricula that help identify students who need additional support prior to the APPE year.