1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199901/03)17:1<47::aid-bsl333>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assistive technology patenting trends and the Americans with Disabilities Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, innovations designed for those with disabilities can have spillover effects to the wider population, e.g. the ageing population (Berven and Blanck, 1999).…”
Section: Importance Of Intersectionality For Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, innovations designed for those with disabilities can have spillover effects to the wider population, e.g. the ageing population (Berven and Blanck, 1999).…”
Section: Importance Of Intersectionality For Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, en-try and success of an AT business is a unique challenge even though legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act or the AODA in Ontario provide incentives to entry in the AT market [4,5]. In order to help stimulate the creation or growth of new entrepreneurial ventures that seek to provide assistive technology to those most in need of it, it is important to understand the motivations of those who choose to enter or remain in this industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To transfer technology from an academic institution to industry, protection of intellectual property by patents is an important consideration. 3,4 All manifestations of the course have included AT industry entrepreneur and practitioner guest speakers who provided product operational and patentability evaluations and developmental feedback during various stages in the design process. Further, for the 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 classes, each product team was required to prepare patent applications and present them and their working prototypes to the University of Rhode Island's Intellectual Property Committee (IPC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%