2017
DOI: 10.1177/155698451701200312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assistive Techniques for Proximal Anastomosis in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the preparation, the proximal anastomosis of SVG was performed as usual without any difficulty. 8,9 The average harvesting time was less than 60 min, and the NT-SVG quality was maintained (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the preparation, the proximal anastomosis of SVG was performed as usual without any difficulty. 8,9 The average harvesting time was less than 60 min, and the NT-SVG quality was maintained (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…After the preparation, the proximal anastomosis of SVG was performed as usual without any difficulty. 8,9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovations 19 (2) wound protector into the pericardium through the RAST, after opening the ICS using a small metal retractor. This method allows the ascending aorta to be very close to the right-side skin incision, which conveniently positions the anastomosis site.…”
Section: Declaration Of Conflicting Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has become popular in recent years, and favorable outcomes have been reported by various sources. 1 Despite advancements that have facilitated proximal anastomosis of the ascending aorta through left small thoracotomy, 2 certain challenges persist. The difficulty of using a side clamp in MICS CABG is particularly pronounced in patients with atherosclerosis and plaques along the ascending aorta and in those with a dilated heart due to poor cardiac function, thus limiting the range of indications for MICS CABG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%