Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations

Abstract

Learning with multiple representations is usually employed in order to foster understanding. However, it also imposes high demands on the learners and often does not lead to the expected results, especially because the learners do not integrate the different representations. Thus, it is necessary to support the learners' self-explanation activity, which concerns the integration and understanding of multiple representations. In the present experiment, we employed multi-representational worked-out examples and tested the effects of two types of self-explanation prompts as help procedures for integrating and understanding multiple representations. The participants (N = 62) learned about probability theory under three conditions: (a) open self-explanation prompts, (b) self-explanation prompts in an assistance-giving-assistance-withholding procedure (assisting self-explanation prompts), or (c) no prompts (control group). Both types of self-explanation prompts fostered procedural knowledge. This effect was mediated by self-explanations directed to domain principles. Conceptual knowledge was particularly fostered by assisting selfexplanation prompts which was mediated by self-explanations on the rationale of a principle. Thus, for enhancing high-quality self-explanations and both procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding, we conclude that assisting self-explanation prompts should be provided. We call this the assisting self-explanation prompt effect which refers to the elicitation of high-quality self-explanations and the acquisition of deep understanding.

What makes an online learning journal powerful for VET? Distinguishing productive usage patterns and effective learning strategies

“…Learners tend to use journals to report descriptive accounts of events with no deeper reflection of underlying meaning Hargreaves 2004;Minott 2008;O'Connell and Dyment 2004;Richardson and Maltby 1995;Ryan 2013;Wessel and Larin 2006). Learners need tools and scaffolds to report and reflect on their experiences (Berthold et al 2009;Hübner et al 2010;Kicken et al 2009). Prompts have been studied as scaffolds that aim to structure learners' reflections (Nückles et al 2009).…”

“…Among others, they contribute to help learner connecting theory and practice , to foster deep or strategic learning (Entwistle 2000), and to promote self-regulated learning (Chang et al 2015;Tanner et al 2000). However, learning journals need scaffolds to be efficient for learning (Berthold et al 2009;Eraut 2007;Hüb-ner et al 2010;Kicken et al 2009). Thus, the open question is not anymore if using learning journals can be beneficial but if specific ways of using learning journals have a larger impact on student learning than others.…”

Weak versus strong knowledge interdependence: A comparison of two rationales for distributing information among learners in collaborative learning settings

“…All students were native speakers of German. Pre-studies had indicated that undergraduates generally had problems understanding and applying urn models without training (see also Berthold, Eysink, & Renkl, 2009). …”

Assessing Efficiency of Prompts Based on Learner Characteristics

“…In order to facilitate learning, several different and very specific prompts may be employed that focus on problem-solving [15] general instruction [5], self-explanation [16], or encouraging recall, reasoning, or observation [5]. Prompts can serve multiple functions and can focus on cognitive learning processes, metacognitive self-regulation, and resource management [17].…”