The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13584-020-00419-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisted life termination and truth telling to terminally ill patients – a cross-sectional study of public opinions in Israel

Abstract: Background End-of-life decisions are highly complex socio-normative and ethical phenomena. The goal of this study was to provide an assessment of public opinions in Israel concerning aspects of end-of-life decisions. Methods An online cross sectional study was performed in February 2020. The primary tool including items pertaining to death assistance and truth telling to patients. A sample of 515 participants representative of the ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that despite the overarching consensus on the importance of family caregivers’ involvement in EoL processes, the current legal situation in Israel does not provide a proper framework for such participation, as family caregivers are not automatic substitute decision-makers when the patient loses decision-making capacity. The Patient’s Right Law (1996) and the Dying Patient Law (2005) are not fully compatible with the findings of this and previous studies [ 12 ]. Despite the vacuum created in the absence of such a legal framework, it appears that traditions and habits have developed, allowing family caregivers to impact end-of-life care practices.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is noteworthy that despite the overarching consensus on the importance of family caregivers’ involvement in EoL processes, the current legal situation in Israel does not provide a proper framework for such participation, as family caregivers are not automatic substitute decision-makers when the patient loses decision-making capacity. The Patient’s Right Law (1996) and the Dying Patient Law (2005) are not fully compatible with the findings of this and previous studies [ 12 ]. Despite the vacuum created in the absence of such a legal framework, it appears that traditions and habits have developed, allowing family caregivers to impact end-of-life care practices.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The first one, published by Velan et al (2019) [ 11 ], addresses the attitude of Israeli physicians towards life termination and truth-telling to terminally ill patients. The second one addresses the attitude of the Israeli population toward the same issues [ 12 ]. The third one by Tawil et al (2023) examines qualitatively the role of family caregivers during the EoL process [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A large proportion of published research was undertaken in the past 5 years accounting for its less citations. Out of the total 26 articles, 4 articles had <10 citations,[ 6 7 8 9 ] 11 articles[ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ] had citations between 10 and 50, 4 of the articles[ 21 22 23 24 ] had between 51 and 100, only 2 articles[ 25 26 27 ] had more than 100 citations and 5 of the included articles[ 28 29 30 ] had no citations.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%