2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisted history matching using artificial neural network based global optimization method – Applications to Brugge field and a fractured Iranian reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering petrophysical properties (porosity, permeability and NTG) in each production zone, an ANN-based automated history matching has been done previously by the authors that resulted in 40 different matched models (Foroud et al, 2014). Using one of these matched realizations, a deterministic optimization of the production plan in this field has been performed before (Foroud et al, 2016).…”
Section: Generating Multiple Geological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering petrophysical properties (porosity, permeability and NTG) in each production zone, an ANN-based automated history matching has been done previously by the authors that resulted in 40 different matched models (Foroud et al, 2014). Using one of these matched realizations, a deterministic optimization of the production plan in this field has been performed before (Foroud et al, 2016).…”
Section: Generating Multiple Geological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, simulated reservoirs models with unknown parameters are calibrated by minimizing the misfits between the simulated and history data, which can be used to forecast the reservoirs production and provide support decisions under different operating conditions and in different production stages. As the reservoirs become large and heterogeneous, the highly nonlinear reservoirs models must be elaborate with numerous grid blocks and reservoir parameters, which brings enormous computational burden and complexity for the numerical optimization [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the issue, Assisted History Matching (AHM) techniques have been proposed to replace labor-intensive and costly manual history matching [1,[4][5][6]. Roughly, these methods for assisted history matching can be divided into two categories [7]: the data assimilation approaches (such as Ensemble Kalman Filter and Ensemble Smoother) and the optimization approaches (such as gradient, evolutionary or data-driven-based algorithms).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oil reservoir history matching (HM) is significant for estimating oil reservoir models parameters, making production forecasting and establishing optimal plans for oil reservoir development. [1][2][3] Typically, HM is considered as an inverse problem where the static data (such as core and well logs, etc.) and dynamic observed/production data (such as well rates, pressure, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many HM methods, Bayesian HM naturally makes use of the Bayesian statistical framework to characterize the uncertainty of unknown geological variables with specific priors from oil reservoir theories and represent this kind of inverse problem from a probabilistic point of view, which could be promising. 3,4 Foroud et al 1 summarized the main optimization frameworks and techniques for automatic HM in the following four categories: gradient-based techniques; the meta-heuristic algorithms; response surface modeling; and Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) techniques. All these approaches have their pros and cons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%