2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011gl050655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assimilation of passive and active microwave soil moisture retrievals

Abstract: [1] Near-surface soil moisture observations from the active microwave ASCAT and the passive microwave AMSR-E satellite instruments are assimilated, both separately and together, into the NASA Catchment land surface model over 3.5 years using an ensemble Kalman filter. The impact of each assimilation is evaluated using in situ soil moisture observations from 85 sites in the US and Australia, in terms of the anomaly time series correlation-coefficient, R. The skill gained by assimilating either ASCAT or AMSR-E w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
218
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
218
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, without bias correction, it is not possible to conduct meaningful comparisons between in situ, satellite-retrieved and modelled SM for validation and optimal data assimilation (Yilmaz and Crow, 2013). Standard bias correction methods are now increasingly being applied to SM assimilation in land models (Reichle et al, 2007;Kumar et al, 2012;Draper et al, 2012), numerical weather prediction (Drusch et al, 2005;Scipal et al, 2008a) and hydrologic models (Brocca et al, 2012). proposed matching statistical moments of the data, while linear methods based on simple regression and matching dynamic ranges have also been considered (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without bias correction, it is not possible to conduct meaningful comparisons between in situ, satellite-retrieved and modelled SM for validation and optimal data assimilation (Yilmaz and Crow, 2013). Standard bias correction methods are now increasingly being applied to SM assimilation in land models (Reichle et al, 2007;Kumar et al, 2012;Draper et al, 2012), numerical weather prediction (Drusch et al, 2005;Scipal et al, 2008a) and hydrologic models (Brocca et al, 2012). proposed matching statistical moments of the data, while linear methods based on simple regression and matching dynamic ranges have also been considered (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All SMOS observations were bias corrected by accounting for the climatological differences (mean and standard deviation) between SMOS T B observations and the model equivalents obtained with a low frequency passive microwave radiative transfer model. To obtain rescaling coefficients accounting for the seasonal meteorology, a seasonal linear rescaling approach was conducted following the same approach as in [26]. More information about the bias correction scheme applied to SMOS data will be published later in [27].…”
Section: Experiments Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used the EnKF, which is a relatively simple and flexible technique for assimilating satellite data into land surface models (e.g. Draper et al, 2012;Reichle et al, 2002Reichle et al, , 2008Kumar et al, 2008Kumar et al, , 2009Pipunic et al, 2008;Crow and Wood, 2003; …”
Section: Data Assimilation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The daily CCI-SM product (v03.2) is produced at 0.25° spatial resolution from the microwave retrieved surface soil moisture data and is merged from multiple sensors (Dorigo et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2011;Wagner et al, 2012; http://www.esa-5 oilmoisture-cci.org). For the study period of 2000 to 2006, the CCI-SM data are based on passive microwave observations (i.e.…”
Section: Esa CCI Microwave Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%