“…The EnKF has the advantage of providing flow-dependent time-varying estimation of background error covariances, compared with variational-based assimilation techniques like 3DVar (Zhang et al 2011), and thus is widely used in data assimilation applications for severe thunderstorms at convection-allowing storm scales (e.g., Snyder and Zhang 2003;Aksoy et al 2009;Dowell et al 2011;Wheatley et al 2015;Yussouf et al 2015;Yokota et al 2016). Observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) of the direct assimilation of synthetic ABI BT observations using EnKF have mostly focused on extratropical cyclones (Otkin 2010(Otkin , 2012Zupanski et al 2011;Jones et al 2013), mesoscale convective systems (Jones et al 2014;Cintineo et al 2016), or tropical cyclones (F. Zhang 2017, 2018a); recently, Honda et al (2018a,b) assimilated real-data all-sky radiance observations from the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) on board the Himawari-8 satellite, which has similar infrared channels as the ABI onboard the GOES-16 satellites, to improve predictions of tropical cyclones and associated torrential precipitation and floods. However, stormscale data assimilation studies using geostationary satellite observations only assimilated temperature and moisture profile retrievals (Jones et al 2017), cloud-top temperature (Kerr et al 2015), water paths of different hydrometeor species (Jones and Stensrud 2015;Jones et al 2015Jones et al , 2016, and GOES-13 clear-sky infrared radiance (Jones et al 2018), rather than all-sky (clear sky and cloud affected) infrared radiance observations from high spatiotemporal imagers like the ABI.…”