2020
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-19-0379.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assimilation of GOES-16 Radiances and Retrievals into the Warn-on-Forecast System

Abstract: The increasing maturity of the Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) coupled with the now operational GOES-16 satellite allows for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the relative impacts of assimilating GOES-16 all-sky 6.2-, 6.9-, and 7.3-μm channel radiances compared to other radar and satellite observations. The WoFS relies on cloud property retrievals such as cloud water path, which have been proven to increase forecast skill compared to only assimilating radar data and other conventional observations. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The poor performance in Kansas in the 17 May case is likely due to a warm and dry bias of the near‐storm environment. As discussed above, assimilating more observations such as boundary‐layer observations and/or satellite radiance (such as Jones et al ., 2020) may help alleviate this problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The poor performance in Kansas in the 17 May case is likely due to a warm and dry bias of the near‐storm environment. As discussed above, assimilating more observations such as boundary‐layer observations and/or satellite radiance (such as Jones et al ., 2020) may help alleviate this problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeking to assimilate more available observations, especially those depicting the near-storm environment, could potentially help alleviate this drawback. For example, using the GSI-EnKF DA system, Jones et al (2020) demonstrated that a favorable (moister and colder) environment is produced by assimilating GOES 16 all-sky radiances in addition to radar observations (their ALL experiment, Figures 6d and 7b), and the simulated dryline position is near the location of the observed convection initiation. Therefore, as seen from their figures 4d and 5d, only forecasts with the additional favorable environment can successfully predict the initiation and subsequent development of the Kansas storm, though with slightly larger coverage compared with the observations.…”
Section: The 17 May Tornadic Supercells In Central Plainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object-based methods present a powerful way to analyze cloud cover forecast accuracy because traditional metrics typically penalize CAM forecasts for displacement errors between the forecast and observed cloud objects. Therefore, object-based methods and IR BTs have been used to assess forecast accuracy (Griffin et al, 2017a(Griffin et al, , 2017b(Griffin et al, , 2020Jones et al, 2018Jones et al, , 2020Senf et al, 2018;Skinner et al, 2016Skinner et al, , 2018. In this analysis, cloud objects are identified in simulated and observed satellite imagery using the Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE; Bullock et al, 2016;Davis et al, 2006aDavis et al, , 2006bDavis et al, , 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensemble-based data assimilation techniques, such as the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), play an important role in recent advances in the assimilation of all-sky infrared (IR) brightness temperatures (BTs) into regional numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Different variations of the EnKF are used in numerous observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs; e.g., Otkin, 2010Otkin, , 2012Zupanski et al, 2011;Jones et al, 2013Jones et al, , 2014Cintineo et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2016a;Minamide and Zhang, 2017) and realdata studies (e.g., Zhang et al, 2016aZhang et al, , 2018Zhang et al, , 2019aZhang et al, , b, 2021Honda et al, 2018a, b;Minamide and Zhang, 2018;Okamoto et al, 2019;Otkin and Potthast, 2019;Chan et al, 2020;Jones et al, 2020). The EnKF uses flow-dependent background error covariances, and several studies show that the EnKF is more suitable for convective phenomena at the mesoscales and the storm scales than traditional variational techniques (e.g., Meng and Zhang, 2008;Zhang and Zhang, 2012;Schwartz and Liu, 2014;Johnson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%