2014
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2014.31.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assimilation effects on infant mortality among immigrants in Norway: Does maternal source country matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding first generation immigrant children, it is not unlikely that the sickest children, especially the youngest ones, do not start or complete their journeys, while among second generation children, who are born in Norway, this selection effect, if at all present, would only apply through the previous selection of their parents. Furthermore, statistics from Norway indicate that immigrant infants born in Norway with mothers from low-income countries have higher mortality than children with non-immigrants background, 24 which would accord to our results of second generation children using the system more when including also the youngest children in the analyses. Another possible explanation for our findings could be that the stress and strain associated with the immigration process itself have more severe health consequences for small children than for teen-age children causing more health-seeking behaviour in this group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Regarding first generation immigrant children, it is not unlikely that the sickest children, especially the youngest ones, do not start or complete their journeys, while among second generation children, who are born in Norway, this selection effect, if at all present, would only apply through the previous selection of their parents. Furthermore, statistics from Norway indicate that immigrant infants born in Norway with mothers from low-income countries have higher mortality than children with non-immigrants background, 24 which would accord to our results of second generation children using the system more when including also the youngest children in the analyses. Another possible explanation for our findings could be that the stress and strain associated with the immigration process itself have more severe health consequences for small children than for teen-age children causing more health-seeking behaviour in this group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The infant mortality rate (IMR) is widely used. It is a measure not only used as a direct indicator of the risk of infant death, but also indirectly as an indicator of overall population health, the availability and quality of health care services, and socioeconomic status differentials (Hummer 2005;Kinge and Kornstad 2014;Kitagawa and Hauser 1973;Link and Phelan 1995;Ram et al 2016;Stockwell et al 2005;Stockwell et al 1987). 1 Because statistical data are often used to guide health policy decisions, it is not surprising that the IMR is used in this regard (Chen et al 2016;Infant Mortality Review Committee 2016;Kleinman 1996;Misra et al 2004;Stockwell et al 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical strategy for dealing with the combination of these two issues is to aggregate data for small populations and generate what amounts to an arithmetic average from them. 3 Another strategy is to gain permission to access individual level records, match them and then construct statistics (Kinge and Kornstad, 2014). However, unlike the strategy of aggregation, this approach inevitably requires administrative approval and requires both a substantial amount of time and personnel costs to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy is to gain permission to access individual level records, match them and then construct statistics (Kinge and Kornstad, 2014). This strategy is used by the California Department of Public Health (see endnote 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%